- EXPLORE Coupons Tech Help Pro Random Article About Us Quizzes Contribute Train Your Brain Game Improve Your English Popular Categories Arts and Entertainment Artwork Books Movies Computers and Electronics Computers Phone Skills Technology Hacks Health Men's Health Mental Health Women's Health Relationships Dating Love Relationship Issues Hobbies and Crafts Crafts Drawing Games Education & Communication Communication Skills Personal Development Studying Personal Care and Style Fashion Hair Care Personal Hygiene Youth Personal Care School Stuff Dating All Categories Arts and Entertainment Finance and Business Home and Garden Relationship Quizzes Cars & Other Vehicles Food and Entertaining Personal Care and Style Sports and Fitness Computers and Electronics Health Pets and Animals Travel Education & Communication Hobbies and Crafts Philosophy and Religion Work World Family Life Holidays and Traditions Relationships Youth
- HELP US Support wikiHow Community Dashboard Write an Article Request a New Article More Ideas...
- EDIT Edit this Article
- PRO Courses New Tech Help Pro New Expert Videos About wikiHow Pro Coupons Quizzes Upgrade Sign In
- Browse Articles
- Quizzes New
- Train Your Brain New
- Improve Your English New
- Support wikiHow
- About wikiHow
- Easy Ways to Help
- Approve Questions
- Fix Spelling
- More Things to Try...
- H&M Coupons
- Hotwire Promo Codes
- StubHub Discount Codes
- Ashley Furniture Coupons
- Blue Nile Promo Codes
- NordVPN Coupons
- Samsung Promo Codes
- Chewy Promo Codes
- Ulta Coupons
- Vistaprint Promo Codes
- Shutterfly Promo Codes
- DoorDash Promo Codes
- Office Depot Coupons
- adidas Promo Codes
- Home Depot Coupons
- DSW Coupons
- Bed Bath and Beyond Coupons
- Lowe's Coupons
- Surfshark Coupons
- Nordstrom Coupons
- Walmart Promo Codes
- Dick's Sporting Goods Coupons
- Fanatics Coupons
- Edible Arrangements Coupons
- eBay Coupons
- Log in / Sign up
- Education and Communications
- Critical Reviews
How to Write an Article Review
Last Updated: January 31, 2023 References Approved
This article was co-authored by Jake Adams . Jake Adams is an academic tutor and the owner of Simplifi EDU, a Santa Monica, California based online tutoring business offering learning resources and online tutors for academic subjects K-College, SAT & ACT prep, and college admissions applications. With over 14 years of professional tutoring experience, Jake is dedicated to providing his clients the very best online tutoring experience and access to a network of excellent undergraduate and graduate-level tutors from top colleges all over the nation. Jake holds a BS in International Business and Marketing from Pepperdine University. wikiHow marks an article as reader-approved once it receives enough positive feedback. This article received 83 testimonials and 91% of readers who voted found it helpful, earning it our reader-approved status. This article has been viewed 2,898,052 times.
An article review is both a summary and an evaluation of another writer's article. Teachers often assign article reviews to introduce students to the work of experts in the field. Experts also are often asked to review the work of other professionals. Understanding the main points and arguments of the article is essential for an accurate summation. Logical evaluation of the article's main theme, supporting arguments, and implications for further research is an important element of a review . Here are a few guidelines for writing an article review.
Education specialist Alexander Peterman recommends: "In the case of a review, your objective should be to reflect on the effectiveness of what has already been written, rather than writing to inform your audience about a subject."
Things You Should Know
- Read the article very closely, and then take time to reflect on your evaluation. Consider whether the article effectively achieves what it set out to.
- Write out a full article review by completing your intro, summary, evaluation, and conclusion. Don't forget to add a title, too!
- Proofread your review for mistakes (like grammar and usage), while also cutting down on needless information.
Preparing to Write Your Review
- Article reviews present more than just an opinion. You will engage with the text to create a response to the scholarly writer's ideas. You will respond to and use ideas, theories, and research from your studies. Your critique of the article will be based on proof and your own thoughtful reasoning.
- An article review only responds to the author's research. It typically does not provide any new research. However, if you are correcting misleading or otherwise incorrect points, some new data may be presented.
- An article review both summarizes and evaluates the article.
- Summarize the article. Focus on the important points, claims, and information.
- Discuss the positive aspects of the article. Think about what the author does well, good points she makes, and insightful observations.
- Identify contradictions, gaps, and inconsistencies in the text. Determine if there is enough data or research included to support the author's claims. Find any unanswered questions left in the article.
- Make note of words or issues you don't understand and questions you have.
- Look up terms or concepts you are unfamiliar with, so you can fully understand the article. Read about concepts in-depth to make sure you understand their full context.
- Pay careful attention to the meaning of the article. Make sure you fully understand the article. The only way to write a good article review is to understand the article.
- With either method, make an outline of the main points made in the article and the supporting research or arguments. It is strictly a restatement of the main points of the article and does not include your opinions.
- After putting the article in your own words, decide which parts of the article you want to discuss in your review. You can focus on the theoretical approach, the content, the presentation or interpretation of evidence, or the style. You will always discuss the main issues of the article, but you can sometimes also focus on certain aspects. This comes in handy if you want to focus the review towards the content of a course. [7] X Research source
- Review the summary outline to eliminate unnecessary items. Erase or cross out the less important arguments or supplemental information. Your revised summary can serve as the basis for the summary you provide at the beginning of your review.
- What does the article set out to do?
- What is the theoretical framework or assumptions?
- Are the central concepts clearly defined?
- How adequate is the evidence?
- How does the article fit into the literature and field?
- Does it advance the knowledge of the subject?
- How clear is the author's writing? [8] X Research source Don't: include superficial opinions or your personal reaction. Do: pay attention to your biases, so you can overcome them.
Writing the Article Review
- For example, in MLA , a citation may look like: Duvall, John N. "The (Super)Marketplace of Images: Television as Unmediated Mediation in DeLillo's White Noise ." Arizona Quarterly 50.3 (1994): 127-53. Print.
- For example: The article, "Condom use will increase the spread of AIDS," was written by Anthony Zimmerman, a Catholic priest.
- Your introduction should only be 10-25% of your review. [12] X Research source
- End the introduction with your thesis. Your thesis should address the above issues. For example: Although the author has some good points, his article is biased and contains some misinterpretation of data from others’ analysis of the effectiveness of the condom. [13] X Research source www.richard.jewell.net/WforC/WRITEREAD/CritReview/samples.htm
- Use direct quotes from the author sparingly.
- Review the summary you have written. Read over your summary many times to ensure that your words are an accurate description of the author's article.
- Support your critique with evidence from the article or other texts.
- The summary portion is very important for your critique. You must make the author's argument clear in the summary section for your evaluation to make sense. [15] X Research source
- Remember, this is not where you say if you liked the article or not. You are assessing the significance and relevance of the article. [16] X Research source
- Use a topic sentence and supportive arguments for each opinion. For example, you might address a particular strength in the first sentence of the opinion section, followed by several sentences elaborating on the significance of the point.
- This should only be about 10% of your overall essay.
- For example: This critical review has evaluated the article "Condom use will increase the spread of AIDS" by Anthony Zimmerman. The arguments in the article show the presence of bias, prejudice, argumentative writing without supporting details, and misinformation. These points weaken the author’s arguments and reduce his credibility. [17] X Research source www.richard.jewell.net/WforC/WRITEREAD/CritReview/samples.htm
- Make sure you have identified and discussed the 3-4 key issues in the article. [18] X Research source
Sample Article Reviews
Expert Q&A
You Might Also Like
- ↑ https://academicskills.anu.edu.au/node/492
- ↑ http://www.history.vt.edu/undergraduate/article_review.htm
- ↑ Jake Adams. Academic Tutor & Test Prep Specialist. Expert Interview. 24 July 2020.
- ↑ http://blog.efpsa.org/2012/09/01/how-to-write-a-good-title-for-journal-articles/
- ↑ www.richard.jewell.net/WforC/WRITEREAD/CritReview/samples.htm
About This Article
If you have to write an article review, read through the original article closely, taking notes and highlighting important sections as you read. Next, rewrite the article in your own words, either in a long paragraph or as an outline. Open your article review by citing the article, then write an introduction which states the article’s thesis. Next, summarize the article, followed by your opinion about whether the article was clear, thorough, and useful. Finish with a paragraph that summarizes the main points of the article and your opinions. To learn more about what to include in your personal critique of the article, keep reading the article! Did this summary help you? Yes No
- Send fan mail to authors
Reader Success Stories
Prince Asiedu-Gyan
Apr 22, 2022
Did this article help you?
Sammy James
Sep 12, 2017
Juabin Matey
Aug 30, 2017
Sidelil Junior
A'Myria Bennett
Sep 24, 2022
Featured Articles
Trending Articles
Watch Articles
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Policy
- Do Not Sell or Share My Info
- Not Selling Info
wikiHow Tech Help Pro:
Develop the tech skills you need for work and life
How to Write an Article Review: Tips and Examples
An article review format allows scholars or students to analyze and evaluate the work of other experts in a given field. Outside of the education system, experts often review the work of their peers for clarity, originality, and contribution to the discipline of study.
When answering the questions of what is an article review and how to write one, you must understand the depth of analysis and evaluation that your instructor is seeking.
What Is an Article Review
That is a type of professional paper writing which demands a high level of in-depth analysis and a well-structured presentation of arguments. It is a critical, constructive evaluation of literature in a particular field through summary, classification, analysis, and comparison.
If you write a scientific review, you have to use database searches to portray the research. Your primary goal is to summarize everything and present a clear understanding of the topic you’ve been working on.
Writing Involves:
- Summarization, classification, analysis, critiques, and comparison.
- The analysis, evaluation, and comparison require use theories, ideas, and research, relevant to the subject area of the article.
- It is also worth nothing if a review does not introduce new information, but instead presents a response to another writer’s work.
- Check out other samples to gain a better understanding of how to review the article.
Types of Review
There are few types of article reviews.
Journal Article Review
Much like all other reviews, a journal article review evaluates strengths and weaknesses of a publication. A qualified paper writer must provide the reader with an analysis and interpretation that demonstrates the article’s value.
Research Article Review
It differs from a journal article review by the way that it evaluates the research method used and holds that information in retrospect to analysis and critique.
Science Article Review
Scientific article review involves anything in the realm of science. Often, scientific publications include more information on the background that you can use to analyze the publication more comprehensively.
Need an Article Review Written?
Just send us the requirements to your paper and watch one of our writers crafting an original paper for you.
Formatting an Article Review
The format of the article should always adhere to the citation style required by your professor. If you’re not sure, seek clarification on the preferred format and ask him to clarify several other pointers to complete the formatting of an article review adequately.
How Many Publications Should You Review?
- In what format you should cite your articles (MLA, APA, ASA, Chicago, etc.)?
- What length should your review be?
- Should you include a summary, critique, or personal opinion in your assignment?
- Do you need to call attention to a theme or central idea within the articles?
- Does your instructor require background information?
When you know the answers to these questions, you may start writing your assignment. Below are examples of MLA and APA formats, as those are the two most common citation styles.
Using the APA Format
Articles appear most commonly in academic journals, newspapers, and websites. If you write an article review in the APA format, you will need to write bibliographical entries for the sources you use:
- Web : Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Year, Month Date of Publication). Title. Retrieved from {link}
- Journal : Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Publication Year). Publication Title. Periodical Title, Volume(Issue), pp.-pp.
- Newspaper : Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Year, Month Date of Publication). Publication Title. Magazine Title, pp. xx-xx.
Using MLA Format
- Web : Last, First Middle Initial. “Publication Title.” Website Title. Website Publisher, Date Month Year Published. Web. Date Month Year Accessed.
- Newspaper : Last, First M. “Publication Title.” Newspaper Title [City] Date, Month, Year Published: Page(s). Print.
- Journal : Last, First M. “Publication Title.” Journal Title Series Volume. Issue (Year Published): Page(s). Database Name. Web. Date Month Year Accessed.
The Pre-Writing Process
Facing this task for the first time can really get confusing and can leave you being unsure where to begin. To create a top-notch article review, start with a few preparatory steps. Here are the two main stages to get you started:
Step 1: Define the right organization for your review. Knowing the future setup of your paper will help you define how you should read the article. Here are the steps to follow:
- Summarize the article — seek out the main points, ideas, claims, and general information presented in the article.
- Define the positive points — identify the strong aspects, ideas, and insightful observations the author has made.
- Find the gaps —- determine whether or not the author has any contradictions, gaps, or inconsistencies in the article and evaluate whether or not he or she used a sufficient amount of arguments and information to support his or her ideas.
- Identify unanswered questions — finally, identify if there are any questions left unanswered after reading the piece.
Step 2: Move on and review the article. Here is a small and simple guide to help you do it right:
- Start off by looking at and assessing the title of the piece, its abstract, introductory part, headings and subheadings, opening sentences in its paragraphs, and its conclusion.
- First, read only the beginning and the ending of the piece (introduction and conclusion). These are the parts where authors include all of their key arguments and points. Therefore, if you start with reading these parts, it will give you a good sense of the author’s main points.
- Finally, read the article fully.
These three steps make up most of the prewriting process. After you are done with them, you can move on to writing your own review—and we are going to guide you through the writing process as well.
Organization in an assignment like this is of utmost importance. Before embarking on your writing process, you could outline your assignment or use an article review template to organize your thoughts more coherently.
Outline and Template
As you progress with reading your article, organize your thoughts into coherent sections in an outline. As you read, jot down important facts, contributions, or contradictions. Identify the shortcomings and strengths of your publication. Begin to map your outline accordingly.
If your professor does not want a summary section or a personal critique section, then you must alleviate those parts from your writing. Much like other assignments, an article review must contain an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. Thus you might consider dividing your outline according to these sections as well as subheadings within the body. If you find yourself troubled with the prewriting and the brainstorming process for this assignment, seek out a sample outline.
Your custom essay must contain these constituent parts:
- Pre-title page : here, you will want to list the type of the article that you are reviewing, the title of the publication, all the authors who contributed to it, author’s affiliations (position, department, institute, city, state, country, email ID)
- Optional corresponding author details : name, address, phone number, email, and fax number.
- Running head : Only in the APA format. It is the title of your paper shortened to less than 40 characters.
- Summary page : Optional, depending on the demands of your instructor. The summary should be maximum 800 words long. Use non-technical and straightforward language. Do not repeat text verbatim or give references in this section. Give 1) relevant background 2) explain why the work was done 3) summarize results and explain the method.
- Title page : full title, 250-word abstract followed by “Keywords:” and 4-6 keywords.
- Introduction
- Body : Include headings and subheadings
- Works Cited/References
- Optional Suggested Reading Page
- Tables and Figure Legends (if instructed by the professor.)
Do you need some help with your article review?
Count on the support of our essay writing service
Steps for Writing an Article Review
Here is a guide with critique paper format from our research paper writing service on how to write a review paper:
Step 1: Write the Title.
First of all, you need to write a title that reflects the main focus of your work. Respectively, the title can be either interrogative, descriptive, or declarative.
Step 2: Cite the Article.
Next, create a proper citation for the reviewed article and input it following the title. At this step, the most important thing to keep in mind is the style of citation specified by your instructor in the requirements for the paper. For example, an article citation in the MLA style should look as follows:
Author’s last and first name. “The title of the article.” Journal’s title and issue(publication date): page(s). Print
Example: Abraham John. “The World of Dreams.” Virginia Quarterly 60.2(1991): 125-67. Print.
Step 3: Article Identification.
After your citation, you need to include the identification of your reviewed article:
- Title of the article
- Title of the journal
- Year of publication
All of this information should be included in the first paragraph of your paper.
Example: The report, “Poverty increases school drop-outs,” was written by Brian Faith – a Health officer – in 2000.
Step 4: Introduction.
Your organization in an assignment like this is of the utmost importance. Before embarking on your writing process, you should outline your assignment or use an article review template to organize your thoughts coherently.
- If you are wondering how to start an article review, begin with an introduction that mentions the article and your thesis for the review.
- Follow up with a summary of the main points of the article.
- Highlight the positive aspects and facts presented in the publication.
- Critique the publication through identifying gaps, contradictions, disparities in the text, and unanswered questions.
Step 5: Summarize the Article.
Make a summary of the article by revisiting what the author has written about. Note any relevant facts and findings from the article. Include the author's conclusions in this section.
Step 6: Critique It.
Present the strengths and weaknesses you have found in the publication. Highlight the knowledge that the author has contributed to the field. Also, write about any gaps and/or contradictions you have found in the article. Take a standpoint of either supporting or not supporting the author's assertions, but back up your arguments with facts and relevant theories that are pertinent to that area of knowledge. Rubrics and templates can also be used to evaluate and grade the person who wrote the article.
Step 7: Craft a Conclusion.
In this section, revisit the critical points of your piece, your findings in the article, and your critique. Also, write about the accuracy, validity, and relevance of the results of the article review. Present a way forward for future research in the field of study. Before submitting your article, keep these pointers in mind:
- As you read the article, highlight the key points. This will help you pinpoint the article's main argument and the evidence that they used to support that argument.
- While you write your review, use evidence from your sources to make a point. This is best done using direct quotations.
- Select quotes and supporting evidence adequately and use direct quotations sparingly. Take time to analyze the article adequately.
- Every time you reference a publication or use a direct quotation, use a parenthetical citation to avoid accidentally plagiarizing your article.
- Re-read your piece a day after you finish writing it. This will help you to spot grammar mistakes and to notice any flaws in your organization.
- Use a spell-checker and get a second opinion on your paper.
The Post-Writing Process: Proofread Your Work
Finally, when all of the parts of your article review are set and ready, you have one last thing to take care of — proofreading. Although students often neglect this step, proofreading is a vital part of the writing process and will help you polish your paper to ensure that there are no mistakes or inconsistencies.
To proofread your paper properly, start with reading it fully and by checking the following points:
- Punctuation
- Other mistakes
Next, identify whether or not there is any unnecessary data in the paper and remove it. Lastly, check the points you discussed in your work; make sure you discuss at least 3-4 key points. In case you need to proofread, rewrite an essay or buy essay , our dissertation services are always here for you.
Example of an Article Review
Why have we devoted an entire section of this article to talk about an article review sample, you may wonder? Not all of you may recognize it, but in fact, looking through several solid examples of review articles is actually an essential step for your writing process, and we will tell you why.
Looking through relevant article review examples can be beneficial for you in the following ways:
- To get you introduced to the key works of experts in your field.
- To help you identify the key people engaged in a particular field of science.
- To help you define what significant discoveries and advances were made in your field.
- To help you unveil the major gaps within the existing knowledge of your field—which contributes to finding fresh solutions.
- To help you find solid references and arguments for your own review.
- To help you generate some ideas about any further field of research.
- To help you gain a better understanding of the area and become an expert in this specific field.
- To get a clear idea of how to write a good review.
As you can see, reading through a few samples can be extremely beneficial for you. Therefore, the best way to learn how to write this kind of paper is to look for an article review example online that matches your grade level.
View Our Writer’s Sample Before Crafting Your Own!
Why Have There Been No Great Female Artists?
Need a Hand From Professionals?
Address to Our Writers and Get Assistance in Any Questions!
Related Articles
Article Review
Article Review - A Complete Writing Guide With Examples
Published on: Feb 17, 2020
Last updated on: Dec 19, 2022
On This Page On This Page
An article review format is a scholarly way to analyze and evaluate the work of other experts in your specific field. Scholars or students mainly use it outside of the education system. But it's typically done for clarity, originality, and how well contributions from this expert have been made to their discipline.
When answering questions about what is an article review and how to write one, you must understand the type of analysis the instructor requires. Continue reading to get a detailed idea of writing a perfect article review in no time.
What is an Article Review?
An article review is a writing piece that summarizes and assesses someone else's article. It entails understanding the central theme of the article, supporting arguments, and implications for further research.
A review has specific guidelines and format to write. It can be either a critical review or a literature review. A critical analysis deals with a specific type of text in detail, while a literature review is a broader kind of document.
Moreover, an article review is important because of the following reasons:
- It helps to clarify questions.
- It allows you to see other people’s thoughts and perspectives on current issues.
- It helps you correct the language and sentence structure that does not make sense.
- After reading different reviews, the writers can get out of personal biases.
- It further improves the grammar and makes your writing skills better and clearer.
- Lastly, it helps to provide suggestions or criticism on the article for future research.
Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's our Job
Types of Review
Below are the three main types of article reviews:
1. Journal Article Review
A journal article review is essentially a critique of an academic paper. Here, the author provides his thoughts on both strengths and weaknesses to demonstrate how it fits in with other work and what makes this publication stand out.
Check out the following example to help you understand better.
Example of Journal Article Review
2. Research Article Review
A research article review is different from a journal article review as it evaluates the research methods used in the study. It also compares them to other research studies.
Here is a sample for you to get an idea.
Example of Research Article Review
3. Science Article Review
Science article reviews involve publications in the realm of science. This type of research provides detailed background information so you can understand it in a better way.
Have a look at the below example.
Example of Science Article Review
Article Review Format
The format of your article must follow the citation style required by your professor. If you are not sure, ask him to clarify the following pointers about the preferred format. It will help you format an article review adequately.
- What format is appropriate to cite your articles? (MLA, APA, ASA, Chicago, etc.)
- What should be the length of the review?
- Should it include a summary, critique, or personal opinion?
- Does the professor require background information?
- Does it require mentioning a central idea within the article?
After knowing the answers to these questions, you can start writing your article review. Here, we have mentioned the two most commonly used citation styles, APA and MLA.
1. APA Format
An article can appear in academic journals, newspapers, and websites. You need to write bibliographical entries for the sources you use when writing an APA format article review:
- Web: Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Year, Month, Date of Publication). Title. Retrieved from {link}
- Journal: Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Publication Year). Publication Title. Periodical Title, Volume(Issue), pp.-pp.
- Newspaper: Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Year, Month, Date of Publication). Publication Title. Magazine Title, pp. Xx-xx.
2. MLA Format
Here is how you cite your sources in MLA format.
- Web: Last, First Middle Initial. “Publication Title.” Website Title. Website Publisher, Date Month Year Published. Web. Date Month Year Accessed.
- Newspaper: Last, First M. “Publication Title.” Newspaper Title [City] Date, Month, Year Published: Page(s). Print.
- Journal: Last, First M. “Publication Title.” Journal Title Series Volume. Issue (Year Published): Page(s). Database Name. Web. Date Month Year Accessed.
How to Write an Article Review?
Students often find writing an article review for the very first time daunting. Thus, it is best to start with a few preparatory steps.
The following is a complete step-by-step guide to write an effective article review in no time
1. The Pre-Writing Process
First, you need to know the type of review you are writing as it will help while reading an article. Here are some of the main stages of this process to help you get started.
- Summarize the article by listing all the main points, ideas, insight observations, and general information presented in the article.
- Identify the strong claims that the author has made.
- Identify any possible contradictions and gaps in the article and evaluate if the writer has used sufficient arguments and findings to support the ideas.
- Determine if there are any questions left unanswered by the author.
- Read the article fully.
- Evaluate the title, abstract, introduction, headings, subheadings, opening sentences, and conclusion of the article.
After this process, you can begin writing your own review.
2. Write the Title
First, write a title that reflects the main focus of your research work. It can be either interrogative, descriptive, or declarative.
3. Cite the Article
Next, add the citation for the article that you have reviewed. Consider the style of citation specified by your instructor. For example, if you were using MLA style, the citation would look like this:
Author’s last and first name. “The title of the article.” Journal’s title and issue(publication date): page(s). Print
Abraham John. “The World of Dreams.” Virginia Quarterly 60.2(1991): 125-67. Print.
4. Article Identification
After citing the article properly, include the identification of the reviewed article. All the information given below must be included in the first paragraph.
- Title of the article
- Title of the journal
- Year of publication
For Example
The report, “Poverty increases school drop-outs,” was written by Brian Faith – a Health officer – in 2000.
5. Introduction
Before you start to write, you must organize your thoughts. You can use an article review template or outline of your assignment before you start. However, if you are wondering how to start an article review, always start with writing an introduction. It should contain the following things:
- Thesis of your review
- Summary of the key points of the article
- Positive aspects and facts presented in the research study
- Critique of the publication including contradictions, gaps, and unanswered questions
6. Summarize the Article
Write the summary of the article and discuss the central arguments presented by the author. Also, make a list of relevant facts and findings and include the author's conclusion.
7. Critique It
Here, state the author’s contribution and present the strengths and weaknesses that you have found in the article. Also, make a list of research gaps and see if the facts and theories support the arguments.
8. Draft a Conclusion
This section will sum up the critical points, findings, and your critique of the article. Here, the writer should also state the accuracy and validity of the review by presenting suggestions for future research work.
9. Revise and Proofread
The last step before submitting your article review is revising and proofreading. It is an essential part of the writing process, so make sure to do it right. For this, read the review aloud to identify any spelling, grammar, punctuation, and structure mistakes.
Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Writers!
Article Review Outline
After reading your article, organize your thoughts in an outline. Write down important facts or contributions to the field. Also, identify the weaknesses and strengths of your publication and start to discuss them accordingly.
If your professor doesn't want a summary section, then do not write one. Like other assignments, an article review must also contain an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. So divide your outline according to these sections and subheadings in the body.
If you find that you're having trouble with prewriting and brainstorming for this assignment, try looking for a sample outline. An outline for the article review must contain the below parts:
- Pre-Title Page: State the type of the article that you are reviewing, the title of the publication, authors who contributed to it, and author’s affiliations (position, department, institute, city, state, country, email ID)
- Optional Corresponding Author Details: Name, address, phone number, email, and fax number.
- Running Head: It is the title of your paper, less than 40 characters.
- Summary Page: It is an optional section, depending on the demands of your professor. This summary should be a maximum of 800 words long. Just use clear and to the point language and do not give references in this section. Instead, state the background information about why the work is done and summarize the results.
- Title Page: Full title, 250-word abstract followed by “Keywords:” and 4-6 keywords.
- Introduction
- Body: Include headings and subheadings
- Works Cited/References
- Tables and Figures (if instructed by the professor.)
Refer to the following template to understand outlining the article review in detail.
Article Review Format Template
Article Review Example
Here is a sample review paper for you to write your own perfectly on time.
Sample of Article Review
Law Article Review
Looking at relevant article review examples may be useful to you in the following ways:
- To get you started reading academic works by experts in your field.
- To assist you in identifying the key researchers working in a particular area of study.
- To assist you in describing the significant discoveries and advances made in your field.
- To assist you in uncovering the key shortcomings in your field's current knowledge—which may lead to innovative ideas.
- To assist you in obtaining credible support and documentation for your own consideration.
- To assist you in coming up with even more research subjects.
- To assist you to learn more about the subject and developing into a specialist in your field.
- To get a firm understanding of how to write an effective review.
You can learn a lot about an author's style and voice by reading selections from their work. As you can see, skimming a few samples may be really useful to you.
As a result, the best method to acquire experience writing this sort of paper is to look for an online article review example that matches your grade level.
Article Review Topics
Below you can find examples of topics for article review.
- Communication differences between males and females
- The importance of sport for students
- Negative health effects caused by illegal drugs and substances
- Use of drugs in professional sports
- Obesity and its negative effects on health
- Causes and treatment of infectious diseases
- Gender roles and their change in the modern world
- Gun violence in the USA
- Street art tendencies in the USA
- Illegal immigration in the USA
It is hard to write a good review because you need to find an article in a reliable source and read it. With this, you are also required to evaluate the information and think about any further limitations. Thus, the writer must have exceptional writing and analytical skills.
Therefore, if you are unsure about your skills, you can always get professional help online. MyPerfectWords.com is the top essay writer service that provides legit writing help at affordable rates. Our team of top writers can write papers of all types and for different academic levels and subject matters with perfection.
So, do not think much, and hire our writing services to get your review done within the given deadline.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of an article review.
The main purpose of writing a review is to create an informative synthesis of the best resources available in the literature for an important research question or current area of study.
How long should an article review be?
Article reviews vary in length. Narrative reviews range between 8,000 and 40,000 words. On the other hand, systematic reviews are usually shorter and less than 10,000 words.
Barbara P (Literature, Marketing)
Dr. Barbara is a highly experienced writer and author who holds a Ph.D. degree in public health from an Ivy League school. She has worked in the medical field for many years, conducting extensive research on various health topics. Her writing has been featured in several top-tier publications.
People also read
Get Better at Math: Solving Math Problems Quick and Easy
Learn How to Write an Editorial on Any Topic
How to Avoid Plagiarism - Steps to a Plagiarism Free Paper
How to Write a Movie Review - Guide & Examples
How to Write a Summary - Beginner’s Guide & Example
How to Write an Opinion Essay – A Beginner’s Guide
Evaluation Essay - Definition, Examples, and Writing Tips
How to Write a Thematic Statement - Tips & Examples
How to Write a Bio - Quick Tips, Structure & Examples
How to Write a Synopsis – A Simple Format & Guide
How to Write a Comparative Essay – A Research Guide
Visual Analysis Essay Writing Guide - Format & Samples
List of Common Social Issues Around the World
Character Analysis - Outline, Writing Steps, and Examples
What are the Different Types of Plagiarism - Examples
A Detailed Guide on How to Write a Poem Step by Step
A Complete Appendix Writing Guide for Beginners
Share this article
Keep reading
We value your privacy
We use cookies to improve your experience and give you personalized content. Do you agree to our cookie policy?
Website Data Collection
We use data collected by cookies and JavaScript libraries.
Are you sure you want to cancel?
Your preferences have not been saved.
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
Article review writing format, steps, examples and illustration PDF Compiled by Mohammed Yismaw
2021, Article review writing format, steps, examples and illustration PDF Compiled by Mohammed Yismaw
The purpose of this document is to help students and researchers understand how a review of an academic journal is conducted and reported in different fields of study. Review articles in academic journals that analyze or discuss researches previously published by others, rather than reporting new research results or findings. Summaries and critiques are two ways to write a review of a scientific journal article. Both types of writing ask you first to read and understand an article from the primary literature about your topic. The summary involves briefly but accurately stating the key points of the article for a reader who has not read the original article. The critique begins by summarizing the article and then analyzes and evaluates the author’s research. Summaries and critiques help you learn to synthesize information from different sources and are usually limited to two pages maximum.
Related Papers
Journal of Computer‐ …
Petra Schubert , Kathrin Möslein
Download: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/piller.html The idea of integrating users into a co-design process as part of a mass customization strategy is a promising approach for companies being forced to react to the growing individualization of demand. Compared to the rather huge amount of literature on manufacturing and information systems for mass customization, only little research discusses the role of the customer within the co-design process. Customers face new uncertainties and risks, coined "mass confusion" in this paper, when acting as co-designers. Building on a construction strategy of empirical management research in the form of six case studies, we propose the use of online communities for collaborative customer co-design in order to reduce the mass confusion phenomenon. In doing so, the paper challenges the assumption made by most mass customization researchers that offering customized products requires an individual (one-to-one) relationship between customer and supplier. The objective of the paper is to build and explore the idea of communities for customer co-design and transfer established knowledge on community support to this new area of application.
Andrew McCoy
intechopen.com
Ivona Vrdoljak Raguz
Service Science
Christine T Ennew
Anders Gustafsson , Lars Witell
Purpose–Customer co-creation is becoming increasingly popular among companies, and intensive communication with customers is generally seen as a determinant of the success of a new service or product. The purpose of this study is to analyze customer co-creation based on four dimensions of communication–frequency, direction, modality, and content–in order to understand the value of customer co-creation in service innovation.
Gernot Grabher
Einar Svansson
Service Industries Journal
Christian Kowalkowski
The number of service innovation articles has increased dramatically in the past 25 years. By reviewing 128 articles published between 1986 and 2010, primarily in leading marketing and innovation journals, this study analyzes the progression of service innovation research according to topicality and perspective. The authors summarize prior research by clustering it into three evolutional phases and drawing parallels with the evolution of the wider services marketing field. Overall, the view of service innovation has evolved, from a complement of traditional product innovation to a multidimensional, all-encompassing notion that entails several functions, both within and outside the firm.
Marco Bertoni , Christian Johansson
Abstract In product development, innovation means bringing together people with different expertise to develop breakthrough product and service offers. In spite of their potential, cross-functional efforts are not yet adequately supported from a knowledge perspective, asking for a more open and bottom-up approach for knowledge management.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
RELATED PAPERS
Technology Analysis & Strategic Management
Eva Heiskanen
Research Policy
Peter Jäger
European Journal of Dental Education
Y.P. CHANDRA
Maria Antikainen
Dominic Lindner
Edina Vadovics
Nuria Gonzalez Alvarez
Jouni K Juntunen
Journal of Management
Bettina Bastian
Public Management Review
Isabel Vidal
Journal of the Academy of …
Ian Wilkinson , Subroto Roy
Guido H Baltes
Alexandra Waluszewski
Tuure Tuunanen
Raimo Lovio
Alistair Bowden
Jouni Similä
Johanna Bragge
Management Science
John Roberts
Handbook of Marketing
Jerome Hauser
Journal of Engineering Design
Ola Isaksson , Anna Rönnbäck
Arthur Shulman
Richard Farr
System Sciences, 2004. …
Ralf Reichwald , Dominik Walcher
Dominik Walcher
Ralf Reichwald
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Gary Schirr
International Journal of Innovation Management
Harald von Kortzfleisch
Harald von Kortzfleisch , Christoph Kahle
Chandra Yanto
Information & Management
Matti Pihlajamaa
Patricia Sandmeier
Journal of business market management
International Journal of Technology Management
Managing Service Quality
Tor W. Andreassen
Luis Cancino Muñoz
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
- Find new research papers in:
- Health Sciences
- Earth Sciences
- Cognitive Science
- Mathematics
- Computer Science
- Academia ©2023
Get Started
Take the first step and invest in your future.
Online Programs
Offering flexibility & convenience in 51 online degrees & programs.
Prairie Stars
Featuring 15 intercollegiate NCAA Div II athletic teams.
Find your Fit
UIS has over 85 student and 10 greek life organizations, and many volunteer opportunities.
Arts & Culture
Celebrating the arts to create rich cultural experiences on campus.
Give Like a Star
Your generosity helps fuel fundraising for scholarships, programs and new initiatives.
Bragging Rights
UIS was listed No. 1 in Illinois and No. 3 in the Midwest in 2023 rankings.
- Quick links Applicants & Students Important Apps & Links Alumni Faculty and Staff Community Admissions How to Apply Cost & Aid Tuition Calculator Registrar Orientation Visit Campus Academics Register for Class Programs of Study Online Degrees & Programs Graduate Education International Student Services Study Away Student Support UIS Life Dining Diversity & Inclusion Get Involved Health & Wellness Residence Life Student Life Programs UIS Connection Important Apps Advise U Canvas myUIS i-card Balance Pay My Bill - UIS Bursar Self-Service Registration Email Resources Bookstore Box Information Technology Services Library Orbit Policies Webtools Get Connected Area Information Calendar Campus Recreation Departments & Programs (A-Z) Parking UIS Newsroom Connect & Get Involved Update your Info Alumni Events Alumni Networks & Groups Volunteer Opportunities Alumni Board News & Publications Featured Alumni Alumni News UIS Alumni Magazine Resources Order your Transcripts Give Back Alumni Programs Career Development Services & Support Accessibility Services Campus Services Campus Police Facilities & Services Registrar Faculty & Staff Resources Website Project Request Web Services Training & Tools Academic Impressions Career Connect CSA Reporting Cybersecurity Training Faculty Research FERPA Training Website Login Campus Resources Newsroom Campus Calendar Campus Maps i-Card Human Resources Public Relations Webtools Arts & Events UIS Performing Arts Center Visual Arts Gallery Event Calendar Sangamon Experience Center for Lincoln Studies ECCE Speaker Series Community Engagement Center for State Policy and Leadership Illinois Innocence Project Innovate Springfield Central IL Nonprofit Resource Center NPR Illinois Community Resources Child Protection Training Academy Office of Electronic Media University Archives/IRAD Institute for Illinois Public Finance
Request Info
- United in Safety
- Vaccine Information
- COVID-19 Testing Information
- United in Safety News
- Our Approach to Safety
- COVID-19 FAQ
- U of I System Vaccination Guidelines
- Weekly COVID Briefings
How to Review a Journal Article
- Request Info Request info for.... Undergraduate/Graduate Online Study Away Continuing & Professional Education International Student Services General Inquiries
For many kinds of assignments, like a literature review , you may be asked to offer a critique or review of a journal article. This is an opportunity for you as a scholar to offer your qualified opinion and evaluation of how another scholar has composed their article, argument, and research. That means you will be expected to go beyond a simple summary of the article and evaluate it on a deeper level. As a college student, this might sound intimidating. However, as you engage with the research process, you are becoming immersed in a particular topic, and your insights about the way that topic is presented are valuable and can contribute to the overall conversation surrounding your topic.
IMPORTANT NOTE!!
Some disciplines, like Criminal Justice, may only want you to summarize the article without including your opinion or evaluation. If your assignment is to summarize the article only, please see our literature review handout.
Before getting started on the critique, it is important to review the article thoroughly and critically. To do this, we recommend take notes, annotating , and reading the article several times before critiquing. As you read, be sure to note important items like the thesis, purpose, research questions, hypotheses, methods, evidence, key findings, major conclusions, tone, and publication information. Depending on your writing context, some of these items may not be applicable.
Questions to Consider
To evaluate a source, consider some of the following questions. They are broken down into different categories, but answering these questions will help you consider what areas to examine. With each category, we recommend identifying the strengths and weaknesses in each since that is a critical part of evaluation.
Evaluating Purpose and Argument
- How well is the purpose made clear in the introduction through background/context and thesis?
- How well does the abstract represent and summarize the article’s major points and argument?
- How well does the objective of the experiment or of the observation fill a need for the field?
- How well is the argument/purpose articulated and discussed throughout the body of the text?
- How well does the discussion maintain cohesion?
Evaluating the Presentation/Organization of Information
- How appropriate and clear is the title of the article?
- Where could the author have benefited from expanding, condensing, or omitting ideas?
- How clear are the author’s statements? Challenge ambiguous statements.
- What underlying assumptions does the author have, and how does this affect the credibility or clarity of their article?
- How objective is the author in his or her discussion of the topic?
- How well does the organization fit the article’s purpose and articulate key goals?
Evaluating Methods
- How appropriate are the study design and methods for the purposes of the study?
- How detailed are the methods being described? Is the author leaving out important steps or considerations?
- Have the procedures been presented in enough detail to enable the reader to duplicate them?
Evaluating Data
- Scan and spot-check calculations. Are the statistical methods appropriate?
- Do you find any content repeated or duplicated?
- How many errors of fact and interpretation does the author include? (You can check on this by looking up the references the author cites).
- What pertinent literature has the author cited, and have they used this literature appropriately?
Following, we have an example of a summary and an evaluation of a research article. Note that in most literature review contexts, the summary and evaluation would be much shorter. This extended example shows the different ways a student can critique and write about an article.
Chik, A. (2012). Digital gameplay for autonomous foreign language learning: Gamers’ and language teachers’ perspectives. In H. Reinders (ed.), Digital games in language learning and teaching (pp. 95-114). Eastbourne, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Be sure to include the full citation either in a reference page or near your evaluation if writing an annotated bibliography .
In Chik’s article “Digital Gameplay for Autonomous Foreign Language Learning: Gamers’ and Teachers’ Perspectives”, she explores the ways in which “digital gamers manage gaming and gaming-related activities to assume autonomy in their foreign language learning,” (96) which is presented in contrast to how teachers view the “pedagogical potential” of gaming. The research was described as an “umbrella project” consisting of two parts. The first part examined 34 language teachers’ perspectives who had limited experience with gaming (only five stated they played games regularly) (99). Their data was recorded through a survey, class discussion, and a seven-day gaming trial done by six teachers who recorded their reflections through personal blog posts. The second part explored undergraduate gaming habits of ten Hong Kong students who were regular gamers. Their habits were recorded through language learning histories, videotaped gaming sessions, blog entries of gaming practices, group discussion sessions, stimulated recall sessions on gaming videos, interviews with other gamers, and posts from online discussion forums. The research shows that while students recognize the educational potential of games and have seen benefits of it in their lives, the instructors overall do not see the positive impacts of gaming on foreign language learning.
The summary includes the article’s purpose, methods, results, discussion, and citations when necessary.
This article did a good job representing the undergraduate gamers’ voices through extended quotes and stories. Particularly for the data collection of the undergraduate gamers, there were many opportunities for an in-depth examination of their gaming practices and histories. However, the representation of the teachers in this study was very uneven when compared to the students. Not only were teachers labeled as numbers while the students picked out their own pseudonyms, but also when viewing the data collection, the undergraduate students were more closely examined in comparison to the teachers in the study. While the students have fifteen extended quotes describing their experiences in their research section, the teachers only have two of these instances in their section, which shows just how imbalanced the study is when presenting instructor voices.
Some research methods, like the recorded gaming sessions, were only used with students whereas teachers were only asked to blog about their gaming experiences. This creates a richer narrative for the students while also failing to give instructors the chance to have more nuanced perspectives. This lack of nuance also stems from the emphasis of the non-gamer teachers over the gamer teachers. The non-gamer teachers’ perspectives provide a stark contrast to the undergraduate gamer experiences and fits neatly with the narrative of teachers not valuing gaming as an educational tool. However, the study mentioned five teachers that were regular gamers whose perspectives are left to a short section at the end of the presentation of the teachers’ results. This was an opportunity to give the teacher group a more complex story, and the opportunity was entirely missed.
Additionally, the context of this study was not entirely clear. The instructors were recruited through a master’s level course, but the content of the course and the institution’s background is not discussed. Understanding this context helps us understand the course’s purpose(s) and how those purposes may have influenced the ways in which these teachers interpreted and saw games. It was also unclear how Chik was connected to this masters’ class and to the students. Why these particular teachers and students were recruited was not explicitly defined and also has the potential to skew results in a particular direction.
Overall, I was inclined to agree with the idea that students can benefit from language acquisition through gaming while instructors may not see the instructional value, but I believe the way the research was conducted and portrayed in this article made it very difficult to support Chik’s specific findings.
Some professors like you to begin an evaluation with something positive but isn’t always necessary.
The evaluation is clearly organized and uses transitional phrases when moving to a new topic.
This evaluation includes a summative statement that gives the overall impression of the article at the end, but this can also be placed at the beginning of the evaluation.
This evaluation mainly discusses the representation of data and methods. However, other areas, like organization, are open to critique.
Custom Essay, Term Paper & Research paper writing services
- testimonials
Toll Free: +1 (888) 354-4744
Email: [email protected]
Writing custom essays & research papers since 2008
How to write an article review.
In this short guide, we will take a step-by-step approach to teach you how to write an article review. We will explain the differences between an article review for a variety of subjects and let you know where you can find a great example of an article review on the web. We will begin by first answering the question many students have about this kind of assignment.
What is An Article Review?
An article review summarizes and evaluates another person’s article. It’s an assignment that is usually given to introduce students to written works done by experts in a specific field. A critical review of journal article can be done in just about any discipline, but we can’t go in-depth for each. So we will stay focused on the ones you are most likely to have to work in and then break down the steps you need to take for writing a review article that truly impresses.
Some of the most common types are:
- The Science Article Review
- The APA Article Review
- The Law Review Article
- The Journal Article Review
Each of these has a slightly different approach and style from one another and especially from book review writing. It’s a good idea to get your hands on an article review sample in the related field you must complete your assignment in. You can find excellent published pieces in academic journals at your school library. Or you can turn to a professional writing service to get a custom-written piece sent to you that you can use as an article review template.
What is a Peer Review Article?
Before we move on to the “how to write article review” portion of this guide, we will briefly discuss another type of review article you might come upon at some point: The peer-review article. This type of article is one that is written by a researcher or scholar and then is reviewed by experts in the field before publication. So that means the piece that you see in the journal has already been reviewed and critiqued by others. It also means that it has gone through different versions or drafts. Perhaps one of the best ways to learn how to write a critical review of a journal article is to have a look at how others review experts’ work before they reach publication.
How to Review an Article
The first thing you need to do before writing your review is fully understanding all that you have to do conduct an unbiased evaluation of the published work.
The first thing you need to know about how to review a research article is evaluating its organization. Your review will mirror the author’s structure and format. Focus on the most important elements, including main points, supporting evidence, and claims. It’s a good idea to break up the article into parts to better identify all of the essential elements that need to be addressed.
This type of assignment requires exceptional close reading. If you have gained access to an article review example you will see that the reviewer has been careful to address all of the original article’s main points and supporting evidence. Take what you get from the article and apply it to what you already know about the topic. Do this at least twice to ensure that you cover all of the most important information.
This should be done as a straightforward freewriting session. Just take the main points of the original article and attempt to rewrite in in your own words. This will let you identify the places where you are not in total agreement with what the author has presented. Your writing should be focused on all of the main arguments, main research points, and claims that the author makes.
How to Write a Review Article
The following 5 step-by-step process is all you need to know about how to start an article review. It’s a great idea to start with a couple of practice reviews so that you can become comfortable with this kind of assignment’s main elements.
The best way to adhere to the appropriate article review format is to create an outline before you start the process of writing. Review each of the summary points you made and compare them with the original article. Write down all instances of effective writing as well as any new contributions made to the field. Identify all of the article’s strengths and weaknesses and start to organize the main points with your critique in a clear and concise outline.
Take the original article, outline, and rewrite from the prior steps and start writing a rough draft covering all the main points, arguments, and findings. Since this is a draft you don’t need to worry about getting words right. Don’t stop to make corrections or grammar. Just get the draft down on the page as quickly as possible. Write the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion and then set the draft aside.
The main part of how to write a review of an article is writing your critique. Refer to your outline and summary to draft several paragraphs evaluating the effectiveness of the writer’s arguments. You should address whether the article was useful, thorough, and clear in explaining the subject. The critique will form the body paragraphs, so each paragraph should address a single sub-topic. In each paragraph, decide whether or not you agree with the writer backed up with sufficient support.
The introduction and conclusion should be written after you’ve written the main portion (critique body paragraphs) of the review. Your intro will identify the article, mention its central themes, and arguments made by the author. Your conclusion will summarize the main points of the article in addition to your critique of them. Each of these paragraphs should be no more than 10% to 15% of your review.
Despite everything you’ve learned about how to write an article review, you need to ensure you adhere to the fundamentals of good essay writing. This means that you should set your review aside for a few days before you start your revisions. If you have the time you should set it aside for more time before you start editing and proofreading your work. Writing a great academic review will earn you a high grade and you will be under greater scrutiny since you are critiquing someone else’s ideas, structure, and writing, so be sure to put in the extra work.
There is a lot you need to know about how to write a article review. That’s where we can step in to help. We are a group of highly-qualified academic writers that know everything there is about every kind of assignment. You may not feel you are a strong writer or you may not have the time to write the review article on your own. Whatever the reason may be, we’re available to jump in and help craft a research article review that is guaranteed to earn you a high score.
As Putin continues killing civilians, bombing kindergartens, and threatening WWIII, Ukraine fights for the world's peaceful future.
Article Review
Last updated on: Feb 9, 2023
Learn How to Write an Article Review with Examples
By: Cordon J.
Reviewed By: Chris H.
Published on: Mar 29, 2022
Students often find themselves struggling with the process of writing the article review. It seems like a very simple and straightforward task at first, but some unique features make it challenging to write an excellent one. You should know them before you start writing the article review.
Worry not! If you were assigned to write the review of an article and have no clue how to write it, you are at the right place. In this blog, you will get the most effective topics, tips, and examples that make your writing phase easy and simple.
On this Page
What is an Article Review?
An article review is a common academic assignment where you summarize and assess another person’s article. In this type of assignment, you read a specific article, evaluate it critically, and write your observations in the review.
The main purpose of writing the article review is to:
- Explore the strong and weak points
- Highlight the main methodologies
- Provide a critical evaluation
- Help clarify questions
- Explain the current state of knowledge
A review of an article should not provide new information. Instead, it explores and evaluates the work done by another writer to help you make up your mind on whether or not this piece is worth reading in its entirety.
Moreover, thinking analytically and critically is a must when working on such an assignment. This task can be more difficult than it looks, but success comes with practice.
How to Write an Article Review?
Creating a well-written article review is not easy, but you can do it with some steps. To create an informative and engaging work for your audience, you should follow the below-mentioned steps.
1. Preparation
You need to know what type of review is right for your article. This will make it easier for you to read and understand it.
Below are some main stages that help you get started.
- Read the article. Make notes or highlight the main sections.
- Summarize the main ideas, arguments, findings, and positions.
- Identify the strong claim.
- Critique the article contributes to the field.
- Examine the title, abstract, introduction, headings, and conclusion.
Remember these stages in your mind and start writing your review.
2. Create an Outline
Review each item in the article summary to determine whether it was accurate and clear. Get back to your notes and preliminary outline to see what you include in your review. Then, create an outline and organize all the information you need to add to your review.
3. Write the Title
The title of your review should reflect the main focus. You can either use an interrogative, descriptive, or declarative title to attract readers’ attention and make them want more information about what you're writing about.
4. Cite the Article
Now, place the citation in the proper format. Consider the style your professor recommends; this will help you avoid future problems.
5. Identify the Article
In this step, you should include the identification of the reviewed article. Start by referring to the title, author, and year of publication in the first paragraph.
Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's our Job!
6. Write the Captivating Introduction
An introduction of an article review should accurately summarize the content. It may also mention key themes, arguments, and authors’ claims to identify their position on this subject matter.
You must state clearly what thesis was being argued. Sometimes, the thesis statement is not clearly stated, so you have to examine it yourself.
7. Summarize the Article
An engaging summary of the article discusses its central arguments and includes a list with key findings. The author's conclusion should not be missed in any case because it provides an important perspective on what was talked about previously by summarizing all relevant facts together as well.
8. Write Your Critique
The article’s contribution and importance to the field should be discussed in the article. You can support your critique with facts, evidence, or other perspectives.
It would be great to share your opinion on what is working well and where work needs improvement.
9. Conclude the Article Review
In the concluding section, summarize the main points and your opinion about the topic. Do not add irrelevant and new information that confuses the readers.
10. Proofread
Before you submit your article review, make sure to read it thoroughly and identify any mistakes in spelling or grammar. Proofread it again and again for errors and make it error-free.
Article Review Format
To create a well-written review and get an A+ from your teacher, you must follow the proper format recommended by your professor.
Citation styles can vary depending on the instructor’s requirements. Make sure your citations are formatted correctly to avoid any plagiarism.
If your instructor does not define any format, you can choose the best one from the below-mentioned formats.
An article can be in an academic journal, a website, or a newspaper. You need to include citations for sources when writing in an APA format review.
The below table gives you a better understanding of citing different sources in APA format.
MLA citations are the format used for citing sources in an article review. For those who are not familiar with the MLA citation format, it's just like APA. It's not very difficult, and it is a common method among many academic journals.
Here is an MLA format that you can use for your help.
Article Review Examples
ARTICLE REVIEW SAMPLE
JOURNAL ARTICLE REVIEW EXAMPLE
ARTICLE REVIEW TEMPLATE
ARTICLE REVIEW EXAMPLE APA
Article Review Topics
For those who find it difficult to do research and choose the topics, don’t worry. Our experts compiled some great topics that you can use for your help.
Take a look at the below-mentioned topics and choose the one that matches your needs and interests.
Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Writers!
- Women roles in the modern world
- What new traditions could come out of the COVID-19 situation?
- Current issues in the education of students with visual impairments
- How To stop wasting time and improve your personal effectiveness?
- The future of work is through workforce ecosystems
- The positive aspects of the use of plastic products
- Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the cloud computing
- Significance of future research of artificial intelligence
- Child abuse and its influence on character development
- Global warming
Tips for Writing the Article Review
One of the most important aspects to remember when writing an article review is keeping it interesting for both readers and authors. Here are some tips from our team on how best to approach this:
- Give insight observations about the article.
- Write relevant background information.
- The opening sentence of the introduction should be attention-grabbing.
- Cover all the key points in your review.
- Know that review can be either a literature review or a critical review.
- Keep the main points of the article in mind.
- Keep the length of the article review in mind, e.g., systematic reviews are short in length.
To write a great review, you need to make a proper plan and start writing it. Pick the article from a legal source and evaluate the information for further limitations before writing your opinion about the chosen topic.
Although, if you are overburdened and lack writing skills, you can easily consult the best ‘ write my essay ’ service 5StarEssays.com . We offer top-notch writing services to students of different academic levels at affordable rates.
Contact us and get the best writing help from professionals.
Law, Finance Essay
Cordon. is a published author and writing specialist. He has worked in the publishing industry for many years, providing writing services and digital content. His own writing career began with a focus on literature and linguistics, which he continues to pursue. Cordon is an engaging and professional individual, always looking to help others achieve their goals.
Was This Blog Helpful?
Keep reading.
- How to Write A Bio – Professional Tips and Examples
- How to Write a Poem Step-by-Step Like a Pro
- How To Write Poetry - 7 Fundamentals and Tips
- Know About Appendix Writing With the Help of Examples
- List of Social Issues Faced By the World
- How To Write A Case Study - Easy Guide
- Learn How to Avoid Plagiarism in 7 Simple Steps
- Writing Guide of Visual Analysis Essay for Beginners
- Learn How to Write a Personal Essay by Experts
- Character Analysis - A Step By Step Guide
- Obesity Essay: A Complete Guide and Topics
- Thematic Statement: Writing Tips and Examples
- Expert Guide on How to Write a Summary
- How to Write an Opinion Essay - Structure, Topics & Examples
- How to Write a Synopsis - Easy Steps and Format Guide
- Learn How To Write An Editorial By Experts
- How to Get Better at Math - Easy Tips and Tricks
- How to Write a Movie Review - Steps and Examples
- Creative Writing - Easy Tips For Beginners
- Types of Plagiarism Every Student Should Know
People Also Read
- analytical essay example
- informative speech topics
- how to write a bio
- opinion essay
- types of autobiography
Burdened With Assignments?
Advertisement
© 2023 - All rights reserved
2000+ SATISFIED STUDENTS
95% Satisfaction RATE
30 Days Money-back GUARANTEE
95% Success RATE
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Contact Us
© 2022 5StarEssays.com. All rights reserved.
LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT
SIGN UP TO YOUR ACCOUNT
- Your phone no.
- Password Password must be minimum 8 characters.
- Confirm Password
- I have read Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms and Conditions .
FORGOT PASSWORD
- SEND PASSWORD
How to write an Article Review
Are you stressed because you don’t know how to write an article review? Don’t panic! Practice helps you out in article review writing . As a student, we understand it is a challenging task. But it is a great way to improve your reading, analytical, writing, and scientific skills. So let’s start!
Before getting straight to reviewing an article, you should have some knowledge of what an article review is. So, an article review is a study of writing when you compile and access someone else’s article.
It involves a sensible evaluation of the theme of an article i.e. when you evaluate another persona’s article then there should be some point of reviewing the article.
A review can be a critical review or it can be a literature review i.e. you may or may not agree with the point the writer has made in his/her article.
A critical analysis is a comprehensive type of text dealing with a particular article or book in detail.
Sure, you can archive that dynamic content.
Types of article review-
An article review is an evaluation and summary of someone else’s work, and it has a particular format and some guidelines to write, which you have to follow to review an article. Here, in this blog, we will provide you a complete guide on how to write an article review.
Reviewing an article is essential
- Because it helps the readers to understand the indefinite terms.
- Reviewing the article clarifies so many questions.
- As the review provides suggestion or analysis of the article to the author and that assists or helps the author to execute the work in a better way next time.
How to write a Good article review: The pre-writing process
For reviewing an article in an excellent way, one should first prepare and then write the review.
And the formation of a review includes the following steps that you should follow: –
1 st Step: – Understanding what the article review is.
You should never underestimate the viewers as the viewers of the review already has information and knowledge on the topic and is not the general audience.
So first of all, you need to summarize all the main ideas of the article, the thoughts and all.
And you should also critique the participation of the matter and effectiveness of the field. The review of the article responds to the research of the authors and it does not include new analysis. The review assesses and summarizes the article.
2 nd Step: – Identify the organization of the review article.
Before you even start to read the article you will review, you should know how your articles review will be set up and how does it work.
This will help you understand how to read the article. so that, you can get the maximum information out of it and write an effective review.
You should summarize the article and you should concentrate on the major points and information.
You should discuss the positive viewpoints of the article and think about what the author does well.
Identify all the contradictions and gaps in the text. You should also check if the author has done enough research on the topic he has written. And find if there are any questions left which are not being answered in the article.
3 rd Step: – Preview the article
Start by looking at the tile of the article, abstract and introduction and the headings of each paragraph of the article and the conclusion which the author has concluded.
Read the first few paragraphs just to get the idea of what the author wants to say and the article’s main point.
These steps should help you get the brief idea of the article and you will surely get the bigger picture of what is going on in the article and what the author wants to say. And by doing this you will get the look of the overall argument.
As soon as you start getting the idea of what is going on in the article, start making notes of it and start writing the questions you have in mind. Try to look for the terms and concepts you are unknown with so that you can read about those concepts and get some knowledge about it before writing the review.
4 th step: – Read the article carefully
Read the article very carefully just to make sure that you didn’t left any point the author wants to highlight.
Give it a few readings and the make notes of the essential sections. Just to highlight the main points and details.
Compare what you have read with to your actual understanding of the topic.
Pay careful attention to the meaning of the article. Make sure that you understand the article completely because half knowledge is the worst thing and by understanding the article completely you can write a good review.
5 th Step: – Write the article in your own words.
After reading the article and writing the important points you should write the article again but in your own words and keep it in mind that you write the entire essential points accurately and in a logical manner. So, that it becomes easier for us to get any sort of info from the article by doing this. And then you should review the summary to discard useless items if any.
6 th step: – Write an outline of your evaluation.
After, reading and writing the article in your own words review each and every detail in the article to discover.
Whether the author was correct and clear or not.
Write down all the instances of a productive script. And the articles that you feel, needs improvement with.
Create a record of strength and weaknesses. The strength of the article can be a clear summation of any particular issue.
And the list of weaknesses that may any kind of weakness like it is not providing any new information on the topic or any information that you feel like that they are contradicting the facts.
And then think about a few questions to help you critique and interconnect with the article: –
Here are some questions that you can think of to critique and engage with the article:-
- What is the point of the article?
- What is the theoretical structure and assumptions?
- Does the author define the concepts clearly?
- How satisfactory is the evidence?
- Is there transparency in the author’s writing?
- Transparency is the author’s writing?
- Does it advance the knowledge of the subject or it’s just the knowledge we can find anywhere?
Format of article review: The format you must follow
1 Title page 2 Title ( Article name) 3 Your name 4 Date 5 Abstract It must include around 200 to 30o words. It involves a review question summary, the study reviewed, and the study’s conclusions.
6 Introduction It involves what the article contains. Also, it gives hints to the reader about the article and involves the background information to help the reader understand the article sections.
7 Body It involves the main points in detail.
8 Conclusion It sums up all the main points of your article review and states the article’s purpose.
9 Citation You have to use a standardized reference system such as MLA, APA style , etc.
Format applications- Articles are commonly written in newspapers, websites, and academic journals.
Writing the article review – Step by Step Guide
Now the answer to your question about how to write an article review is here. Follow the steps while writing an article review-
1 st step: – Come up with a unique title for the review.
The title you are thinking of giving to the review should consider the center of your review. You should choose between a declarative title, a descriptive title or interrogative title whichever suits the best according to your article needs.
2 nd step: – Cite the article.
Under the title of the article, Place a complete reference of the article in the proper form and manner. And then move to the next line to begin your article. And don’t skip a line between the citation and sentence.
3 rd step: – Identify the article
After the title and summoning the article you should start your review by relating to the title you have chosen for your review and author of the article and the title of the publication. And the year in the article was published should be written in the first paragraph.
4 th steps: – Write the introduction of the review
The introduction of the article review should have the identifying sentence. It should also mention the fundamental theme of the article and the main aspect of the article and the thoughts and the claims by the author.
You also need to pronounce the author’s opinion.
Sometimes, there are multiple viewpoints in the thesis and the thesis may not the clearly stated than in that case, you may have to determine the thesis yourself and should write it by your own understanding and your own point of view.
5 th step: – Summarizing the article
Now you have to start summarizing the main details, thoughts, and conclusions of the article in your words, pointing to your summary for assistance.
Then show how the article supports its claims and conclusions. Make sure that you don’t forget to add the conclusions of the article. Moreover, This may be done in some paragraphs, and its length will depend on the conditions established by your publisher.
6 th step: – Write the critique
Now, you have to use all your article study and you have to write how thoroughly the author addressed the topic, by using your judgment.
And you should also write your opinion on how precise and useful the explanation of the subject you found in the article.
Write if you agree with the writer’s point or not.
If yes, then provide the reasons why you support the writer and if not then give the reason behind your judgment.
And then indicate the type of audience that can get benefit from reading the article.
Quick Links
- A Definitive Guide On How To Write A Literature Review Outline
- Best Of The Best Ways On How To Write A Critical Review By Experts
7 th step: – Write what you have concluded from the article review.
After compiling all the main points in a paragraph. Write your own opinion about accuracy and clarity and the significance of the article in that paragraph. You can also mention if that implication is connected or not.
The conclusion should always only be at max 10% of the overall essay.
Proofread the work you have done: The post-writing process
To ensure that there is no mistake in the review you have written, you should always check on grammar and mechanics and check if there should not be any mistake.
Remove all sort of unnecessary information. And just for the sake of a good review you should identify and discuss 3-4 critical issues in the article.
We all know writing a compelling and well-formatted article review is a difficult task, but now from the above discussion, we hope you get the answer to your question about how to write an article review. It needs you to find the article from reliable sources, read it completely, analyze the information. So, follow the above steps carefully to write an impressive article review.
If you need any Article Review Help you can contact to Call Tutors . For more information, stay tuned with our blogs!
How can I make my article title?
The title of an article must be short and cover the original description of the content. For example, if you are writing an article review on a flop movie regarding the ship, you can create the title ” Latest movie sinks at the box office.”
Can I study more than one article while writing a review?
Yes, sure! But it must be connected to your study if you want to use it.
Can I add tables and figures in the article review?
Generally, you don’t want to add tables and figures in your article review. It is that type of writing where information from your viewpoint matters. But you can mention the tables and figures through references to the original work.
Similar Articles
Top 19 Tips & Tricks On How To Improve Grades?
Do you want to improve your grades? If yes, then don’t worry! In this blog, I have provided 19 tips…
How To Study For Final Exam – 12 Proven Tips You Must Know
How To Study For Final Exam? Studying for the final exam is very important for academic success because they test…
Leave a Comment Cancel Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .
Review Notes Regularly: Why It’s Important
Initial thoughts: review notes regularly: why it’s important.
Many people have been in these situations, where they take notes, then forget about them. They forget about useful content that can make a difference in their lives. On top of that, unless you review notes you take in a timely manner, you forget most of what you read shortly after you finish reading. Some statistics floating around suggest that you forget about 60 percent of what you learn an hour later.
What are you missing out on because you are not applying what you learn?
Have you read?
How to Improve Learning
Since I started the Read the World Challenge, I’ve taken a lot of notes. The first month of the challenge, I read nine books and took enough notes to fill a notebook. I take handwritten notes, but I hate typing up notes, and it’s very difficult to manipulate handwritten notes. It took me a while to type up my notes, because it was somewhat overwhelming because I was also taking notes for the books I was reading during the second month of the challenge.
I have been slowly reviewing my notes from the first month of the Read the World Challenge, and to my amazement, I cannot believe how much of the great information I captured that I had forgotten. Recently, I wrote a blog post on combining ideas, and while reviewing my notes, I noticed some information that would have made the post so much better. I created the Monthly Reading Matrix as way to walk participants through the process of combining ideas, and there is information in my notes, that will make the Matrix better.
Reviewing the type written notes, is eye opening, to read my reactions to what I read. While I read books and take notes, I include how I feel about what I am reading. How I can use the information – how it can help me in different areas of my business. This makes it easy for me, if some time has elapsed before I get to review my notes. The insights included in the notes add context, which increases my level of understanding of the information, which in turn stimulates my imagination.
Proper Note-Taking to Review Notes Effectively
Productivity: How is Your Note-Taking?
Tips on Note-taking: The Art of Writing While Listening
Taking Better Notes – Learning to Abbreviate Words
To Remember More of What You Read, Take Notes by Hand
Review Notes Regularly
It’s hardly likely that you take notes because you are a serial note-taker, therefore, if you invest the time to take notes in the first place, chances are the information was of some importance to you. You owe it to yourself to apply the information, so your note-taking is not a wasted effort.
I always emphasize the importance of taking notes while reading books, but there are many instances when note-taking is appropriate – while participating in webinars, listening to podcasts, watching videos or movies, taking online courses, and the list goes on and on. When reviewing notes, you take, develop the habit of extracting the five big ideas that you learn, then practice combining the ideas. Don’t restrict yourself to only combining the ideas from the books you read.
Final Thoughts: Review Notes Regularly
I recently surprised myself by automatically combining the idea of the Grand Tour that I learned in the History of Architecture course I took in 2013, to the Read the World Extreme Reading Challenge that I am currently participating in. Actively interacting with your notes allow you to get your creative juices flowing.
Related Post
The Grand Tour – Avil Beckford’s Musings
Learning from history, taking the Grand Tour
How to Combine Ideas
Final Thoughts: Review Notes Regularly: Why It’s Important
If you make it a habit to review notes regularly, you move the information to your long-time memory. Imagine the magic that can happen when ideas start to cross-pollinate organically. Isn't that worth the effort review notes?
About the Author Avil Beckford
Hello there! I am Avil Beckford, the founder of The Invisible Mentor. I am also a published author, writer, expert interviewer host of The One Problem Podcast and MoreReads Success Blueprint, a movement to help participants learn in-demand skills for future jobs. Sign-up for MoreReads: Blueprint to Change the World today! In the meantime, Please support me by buying my e-books Visit My Shop , and thank you for connecting with me on LinkedIn , Facebook , Twitter and Pinterest !
Enjoyed this article?
Find more great content here:
Kon Tiki by Thor Heyerdahl, Summary
How to use the lessons of the grand tour to achieve professional success, celebrating black heritage: the emotional power of the alvin ailey performance in toronto.
We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy
- A Research Guide
- Writing Guide
- Article Writing
- How To Write an Article Review - Tips and Explanation
How To Write an Article Review – Tips and Explanation
In this guide you will find out:
- What is an article review
- Article review format
- How to write a good article review
What is an article review?
An article review is a piece of writing where you summarize and assess another person’s article. It entails a logical evaluation of the central theme of the article, supporting arguments and implications for further research. It is essential to understand the main points and arguments of the article for accuracy during summation.
A review may either be a critical review or a literature review. A critical analysis is a type of text dealing with a particular article or book in detail while a literature review is a broader kind of document. An article review is both an evaluation and summary of another writer’s article, and it has a specific format and guidelines to write.
An article review is essential because:
- It corrects vague terms. In writing of your article, there may be instances of usage of inappropriate words or unclear statements. It helps the writer to decide on whether to change the terms.
- It helps to clarify questions.
- It allows the author to see other people’s views and perspectives on the raised issues. After reading the review, the author can get out of personal biases.
- It allows you to improve your grammar and also facilitate conscience writing.
- It encourages the author to perform better the next time since the review provides suggestions or criticism of the article.
Article review format – how to apply it correctly
- Abstract: It should contain approximately 200 to 300 words. It includes a summary of the review question, the primary study reviewed and conclusions of the study. Note that you should not cite references in the abstract.
- Introduction: Write the topic of the study, which serves as the identification sentence. It should indicate what the article contains. Clearly outline the order in which every sub-topic will be discussed to give the reader background information needed to understand the sections in the article.
- Body: This includes the subtopics that you are addressing.
- Conclusion: It should briefly state your rationale for your review and the purpose of the article.
- Literature cited: Use a standardized reference system. Use MLA style.
Benefits of looking through article review examples
It is important to read on article review samples as this helps learners of a particular field to get introduced to the work of experts in that specific field. The article reviews examples help in different ways such as:
- To identify recent and significant advances and discoveries in a particular field of study.
- To determine the main people working in a specific field.
- To help identify essential gaps in research to find solutions.
- They are used in current debates for references
- They are good for generating ideas about next field of research
- They also help the learner to become an expert in a particular area of study.
Check out our full review: read about best essay writing service review more
How to write a good article review?
For an excellent article review, one should first prepare then write the review.
Preparation includes the following steps:
- Step 1: Understanding what the article review is.
You should be aware that the audience of the review has knowledge on the subject matter and is not just a general audience.
You need to summarize the main ideas of the article, arguments, positions, and findings. Also, critique the contributions of the material and overall effectiveness of the field. Note that,
- The review only responds to the research of the author and does not involve new research.
- It evaluates and summarizes the article.
- Step 2: Identify the organization of the review.
You need to know the setup of your article review to understand how to read the article. Following these steps will help you in writing a useful review:
- Summarize the article.
It includes essential points, claims and information in the article.
- Discuss the positive aspects.
It entails the author’s good points and insight observations
- Identify the gaps, contradictions, and inconsistencies in the article done by the author. Also, identify if there is enough research or data to support the claims of the author.
Look for unanswered questions in the article.
- Step 3: Preview the article.
Look at the title of the article, abstract, introduction, headings, opening sentences of paragraphs and conclusion.
Read the first few paragraphs and conclusion to note the author’s main points and arguments.
Read the article entirely.
- Step 4: Read the article carefully.
Read it several times making notes on essential sections. Just highlight central points and the supporting facts. You should write notes and state cross-references on the essential points.
- Step 5: Put the article in your own words.
Ensure you write all the essential points accurately in a clear and logical manner.
Review your summary to remove unnecessary items.
- Step 6: Create your evaluation outline.
After reviewing the summary outline, identify the significant aspects such as instances of effective writing, contributions to the field and areas which are to be improved in the article. Also, indicate strengths and weaknesses. For instance, an advantage may be the way the author presents an issue while a gap may be that the article does not offer solutions to a problem or lacks enough information on a particular subject.
Make sure that you use specific references and examples.
Read also: How do you write an evaluation essay ?
After the preparation, you can finally write the review, and it includes the following steps:
Step 1: Write the title.
A title can either be a descriptive one, a declarative or an interrogative one. It depends on the focus of your review.
Step 2: Cite the article.
Write the citation of the article in a proper style just after the title of your review. For instance, in MLA citation, your example will look like this: Abraham John. “The World of Dreams.” Virginia Quarterly 60.2(1991): 125-67. Print.
Step 3: Article identification. Write it by stating:
- Title of the article
- Author of the article
- Title of the journal
- Year of publication
Write this in the first paragraph.
An example will look like this: The report, “Poverty increases school drop-outs,” was written by Brian Faith, a Health officer. 2000.
Step 4: Write the introduction.
It starts with the identification sentence. The introduction of the article review also entails the central themes of the article. You should include the author’s claims and arguments, too.
Things to note when writing an introduction:
- You may need to determine the thesis yourself since it may not be evident in the article and sometimes the argument has multiple choices.
- You should not write the statements in the first person (“I”)
- Overall impression of the article should be written using the third person (“he” or “she”), and it should have the formal academic style.
- The introduction should only take 10% to 25% of your whole review.
- It should end with your thesis which must address the above issues. For instance, an example of the argument should look like this:
Although there are good points in the article, it contains misinterpretation of data and bias from others authors’ analysis on the causes of school drop-outs.
Step 5: W rite the summary of the article.
Write the main points, arguments, and findings in your own words. Also, show how the article supports its claims and write the conclusion.
Things to note in writing the summary:
- Write in several paragraphs, the length depending on the publisher’s or instructor’s requirements.
- Include specific examples, statistics or background information familiar to the experts of the particular field you are focusing on.
- Make sure to write the main points of every section.
- Use direct quotes from the author sparingly.
- For accuracy, reread your summary several times correcting every mistake.
Step 6: Write the critique.
Write how well the author addressed the topic using your opinions.
Also, write your opinion on how thorough and useful the explanation of the subject you found in the article is. Indicate the contributions and the importance of the article to the field. Write arguments and central points in the article. Also, write if the points of the author assisted in the argument. Indicate if there are any biases. Specify whether you agree with the writer and if yes, give reasons why you support him/her and if no also give cause for your decision. Indicate the type of audience that would benefit from reading the article.
Step 7: Write the conclusion of the article review.
Summarize the main points in a paragraph. Write your opinions about the clarity, accuracy, and significance of the article in this paragraph. You can also comment on the implications if relevant. It can be helpful for further research. Note that the conclusion should only be 10% of your overall essay. The conclusion is a short summary of all your research. If you are writing an essay about online gambling it can contain information on how to find 10 deposit bonus casino offers.
Step 8: Proofread your work.
Reread your article review to check on grammar, mechanics and any mistakes and then correct them where possible. Remove any unnecessary information. Note that for a good review, you should identify and discuss 3-4 critical issues in the article.
With this guide you are sure to come up with the best article review. However, if you still have any doubts about writing article review yourself, don’t hesitate and reach out for academic guidance:
Get Writing Help
By clicking "Log In", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
Sign Up for your FREE account
Diana from A Research Guide Don't know how to start your paper? Worry no more! Get professional writing assistance from our partner. Click to learn more
論文の種類 ジャーナル、総説(レビュー)、速報(レター)の違い
2019年8月4日 2019年10月4日 2分
実は論文にはレビュー(総説)やレターなどたくさんの種類があります。
「これらの違いって一体なんだろう？」というのが論文を初めて読む人が抱く最初の疑問かもしれません。ここでは論文の種類と違いについて紹介します。
原著論文 (Journal article)
総説・調査論文 (review article, survey article), 普通の論文 (フルペーパー), レター、コミュニケーション (letter, communication), プロシーディング (proceedings), パースペクティブ、オピニオン、コメンタリー、エディトリアル(perspective, opinion, commentary, editorial), パテント (patent), ピアレビュー (peer review).
論文には大きく分けて原著論文と総説論文があります。
- 原著論文(Journal article):
一般に論文といえば、原著論文を指すことが多いです。原著論文は著者ら独自の実験によって得られた成果をまとめた論文です。内容は基本的に1論文1テーマでまとめられており、新規でオリジナリティがあります。原著論文に述べられる研究成果を使って他の論文に投稿すること(二重投稿)は認められません。研究者の成果となる原著論文は厳正に作成することが求められます。
総説はすでに発表された複数の論文をもとに作成された、いわばまとめ的な論文です。通常は特定のテーマ(広範なものから詳細なものまで様々)のもと、そのテーマに精通している専門家が著名・有力な論文を集めて研究の過去と現状、展望を体系的にまとめて紹介するような形をとっていることが多いです。
システマティックレビュー (系統的レビュー:systematic review)は、これまで蓄積された研究成果の中から客観的な基準に合致する論文を選択し、内容を比較・分析することによって、新しい結果や解釈を提示するような調査論文的な性格をもつ論文です。通常の総説よりも客観性が高く新たな知見が得られるという点から原著論文として捉えられることもあります。
ミニレビューはそのまま短い総説論文です。
学位論文(thesis)
学位論文は学士、修士、博士等の学位取得の際にこれまでの課程で実施した研究内容をまとめた論文で、形式や取り扱いは学校によって異なります。学士などでは卒業要件として必須でない場合もある。学位論文は学位取得にふさわしいかを見極める材料として用いられるため、論文にはこれまでの研究内容を示すとともに、研究に関する専門知識や研究者としての能力(伝える力、論理性など)が培われているかを判断されることを念頭において作成しなければいけません。学位論文は、研究活動の総括的な意味合いを含むためテーマが複数になることもあります。ジャーナル論文と比べてイントロダクションを広範かつ詳細に書き、主要な結果以外の内容(ネガティブデータも一部含めて)を記載してデータに対する包括的な考察と今後の方向性も述べます。
症例報告 (case report)
学術雑誌に載っている記事にはArticle、Editorial、Letterなどたくさんのタイプがあります。雑誌によって独自の呼び方をしているものもあるのでややこしいですが、ここでは代表的なものを紹介します。
一般的な論文は「Article」「Journal article」などと記載されていることが多いです。これらは内容が短いレターと対比させて内容が多いことを表すフルペーパー、ロングペーパーと呼ばれることもあります。
論文誌によって定義は異なるので一概には言えませんが、レター及びコミュニケーション (及びBrief article、Preliminary Reports, Notes等)は短い形式の論文でフルペーパーと比べて文字制限があったり、査読工程が短縮されていることが多いです。そのため出版までのスピードが早く速報と呼ばれることもあります。こうした速報性の高い論文を主に取り扱うことによって出版スピードを高めた雑誌は「速報誌」と呼ばれており、完全な研究内容として発表するには時間がかかるが、他の研究者に先をこされないために早く発表したい時などに利用されます。
コミュニケーションよりもレターの方がより簡単で短いことが多いです。
プロシーディングは学会(学術会議)や学術大会などの講演要旨集に掲載される形で発表される形式の論文です。査読がないことが多いですが、査読がされる場合もあります。分野によっては査読がきちんとなされ、一般論文並の扱いを受けます。また、プロシーディングは学会終了後に出版されることもあります。学会発表の要旨でもあるため、研究途中でも書くことが可能でその取り扱いは分野によって異なります。Selected proceedingsは学会が精選したプロシーディングであるためより重要視されます。人文社会系や工学系(土木建築など)ではプロシーディングは重要な研究業績です。
パースペクティブ、オピニオン、コメンタリー、エディトリアルなどは特定のテーマに対する専門家の主観的な意見、批判、解釈あるいは新しい視点での論評の学術記事です。
基本的にこれらの論文は自身のオリジナルな研究成果を発表するような論文とは異なります。また総説のように既報の複数の論文を比較したりまとめたりするというような形をとっていません。
パースペクティブはこれまでの研究テーマに対して著者独自の新しい視点を交えて仮説、展望を述べる記事です。
オピニオンは著者によって提示されたテーマに対する批判記事です。著者の問題提起などが行われます。
コメンタリーは特定のテーマに対する著者の解釈や解説的な内容を含む記事です。
エディトリアルは雑誌編集者の見解を記すエッセイで、主に同じ雑誌に掲載された論文や近年の研究に関する批評が載っています。
パテントは特許文献で論文とは異なります。特許は分野によっては論文と同じく評価される対象
ピアレビューは論文の形態ではなく、査読という意味です。査読は投稿された論文の内容を専門家によって審査する制度です。詳しくは以下の記事を御覧ください
コメントを残す コメントをキャンセル
メールアドレスが公開されることはありません。 * が付いている欄は必須項目です
- EssayBasics.com
- Pay For Essay
- Write My Essay
- Homework Writing Help
- Essay Editing Service
- Thesis Writing Help
- Write My College Essay
- Do My Essay
- Term Paper Writing Service
- Coursework Writing Service
- Write My Research Paper
- Assignment Writing Help
- Essay Writing Help
- Call Now! (USA) Login Order now
- EssayBasics.com Call Now! (USA) Order now
- Writing Guides
How To Write An Article Review
An article review essay is a critical analysis or evaluation of literature in a given field through making a summary of the article in question, comparison, or classification. In case it is a scientific article being reviewed, the writer will be required to use database searches to retrieve the results of the search. It is from the searches the writer chooses the article which is appropriate. It is a common skill that is developed in school, to help the students to establish analytical skills. It means the skills are not just used in the classrooms, but also applies in the work environment. Writing an article review has over time proved to be a difficult assignment for most students. The fact that it involves the critical evaluation of the ideas that have been presented in the article, means it is not just a summary. For most students, an article review is confused with an article summary. The critical analysis of the ideas in the article means the author has to go further than summarizing the content of the article.
Content of this article
- Ideas identification
- Presentation
- Writing process
1. Purposes of an Article Review
- The purpose of the article review essay is associated with the writer summarizing the content of the article, evaluating other literature content, and then adding their own understanding of the content.
- In most cases, the article to be reviewed is going to be difficult to understand which requires the writer to read it severally before they are able to understand it, which then means they will be in a position to offer insights into the content of the article in the review essay.
- One of the major aspects to understand, in reference to the purpose of article reviews essay writing, is professional writing skills. This is relative to, article review requires one to have in-depth knowledge of a certain field, from which the article belongs.
- It is this information that helps in the review of the article and helps the audience to better understand the content and the argument of the writer.
- The purpose of an article review is associated with values that people attach to opinions from others about certain information in a given field.
- It is also a crucial skill for journalists as they have to gather information on a given topic and to further assess how the audience views their work.
- Overall, article reviews build on the skills of the students to become better at analyzing information that interacts with and make professional evaluations and recommendations.
2. Step-by-step guide on article review writing
2.1 first read.
The first part of the article review writing process is reading the article to be reviewed for the first time. The first time helps the writer to understand what it is the article is actually talking about. If it is assigned reading in class, the student may not have come across the article in the past and thus will need to familiarize themselves with the content and the style of the author. The first reading of the article is crucial, as it helps the reader to connect with the author of the article to be reviewed. This also means that the reader will have to take note of the key points of the author, and the basic argument presented in the article, and note down some of the words, phrases, and concepts that are new. These are elements that will then be looked at before going into the next reading. After noting the new information, the reader is supposed to look up the meaning of the phrases, and words and read up on the concepts that have been presented in the article. The information on the various words, phrases, and concepts can be found online or even at the library. It helps with a better understanding of the article and information presented especially if the article is in an unfamiliar field. This also sets the premises for reviewing the article in question, given it is not possible to write a review of an article that one does not understand.
2.2 Close Read
This is followed by a close reading, which is associated with critical reading of the article. In this case, the reader is not just reading to understand but also forming an opinion of the presentation of the information, the style of the author, the ease of understanding the information resented, and even an opinion on the accuracy of the information presented. As such, close reading is associated with the analytical skills of the student. The writer is supposed to take notes of the various aspects of the article that they are going to include in the article review essay. It is crucial as it makes the work of writing the review much easier, relative to collating information that is then sorted out for inclusion in the essay.
2.3 Identify Ideas
After identifying the main ideas in the article, the writer may now develop the essay using their own words.
2.4 Present a Unique Article Review
The point behind an article review essay is to develop the skills to analyze information gathered from the various sources and present it in a unique manner that reflects the ideas of the essay and is presented in a manner that also shows the opinion of the writer. The writer has to be in a position to present the ideas in a professional manner, showing a depth understanding of the information found in the essay.
3. Article review writing process
The first part of the article review essay is the title, which informs the readers what the essay is about. The title is supposed to be short and precise, giving all the information that the reader may need to understand what the essay is about. At the same time, the title is supposed to be catchy, such that it gets the readers interested. For example, the title may be phrased as follows: “Evaluating the rising homegrown terrorism” .
This is then followed by the correct citation of the article to be reviewed. Ideally, it does not only give credit to the author of the article to reviewed but also gives the readers a chance to check out the article that is being reviewed. It is crucial, as some of the readers may want to first read the article under review or may want to compare and make opinions of their own other than what is established in the review essay. In an example, the reference to the article home terrorism may be cited as follows:
Park, S. (2016). Counter-Terrorism in France : Home-Grown Terrorism and the Change of Counter-Terrorism Policy. The Journal Of Peace Studies, 17(3), 117-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.14363/kaps.2016.17.3.117.
Within the text of the essay, however, the writer will acknowledge the work of the author as follows (Park, 2016).
When identifying the article, it is crucial that the writer selects an article that talks about a topic that they are familiar with. This will help them to better analyze the article as they have some background information. Choosing an article that the writer is not familiar with, will further complicate the analysis process. If for example the writer chooses an article on calculous and they are not familiar with the field, they will have a difficult time analyzing the same and may actually distort the meaning presented in the article.
The introduction of the article review essay should be catchy and inform the readers about the topic that they are going to discuss. This is then followed by the introduction of the article to be reviewed, with close reference to the main ideas and arguments presented by the author. The writer then introduces the author of the article and where the information is available, the credentials of the author, and some of their other works. If for example the author of the article is a senior lecturer at the local university and working with a local anti-terror agency, this should be brought to the attention of the readers as it builds on the credibility and authority of the information presented in the article.
The critique section of the essay is organized into three main parts, the introduction of the field in which the article belongs and the wide issues. This is then followed by the article content and later on the review of the ideas and concepts of the article according to the writer. This means that this is content that has to be unique to the writer. If for example, the writer does not agree with the strategies of reducing home terrorism, they may state so in this section and support their argument with facts.
In the conclusion, the writer summarizes the main points of the article and also connects the same with their opinion on the matter.
3.1 Proofreading
To make sure the article review essay is professional, the writer has to read through it and make all the necessary corrections such as grammatical errors.
4. Sample of article review
- Download in PDF
- Download in DOCX
Back to School Offer
Get 20% of Your First Order amount back in Reward Credits!
Get 20% of Your First Order back in Rewards
- Undergraduate
- High School
- Architecture
- American History
- Asian History
- Antique Literature
- American Literature
- Asian Literature
- Classic English Literature
- World Literature
- Creative Writing
- Linguistics
- Criminal Justice
- Legal Issues
- Anthropology
- Archaeology
- Political Science
- World Affairs
- African-American Studies
- East European Studies
- Latin-American Studies
- Native-American Studies
- West European Studies
- Family and Consumer Science
- Social Issues
- Women and Gender Studies
- Social Work
- Natural Sciences
- Pharmacology
- Earth science
- Agriculture
- Agricultural Studies
- Computer Science
- IT Management
- Mathematics
- Investments
- Engineering and Technology
- Engineering
- Aeronautics
- Medicine and Health
- Alternative Medicine
- Communications and Media
- Advertising
- Communication Strategies
- Public Relations
- Educational Theories
- Teacher's Career
- Chicago/Turabian
- Company Analysis
- Education Theories
- Shakespeare
- Canadian Studies
- Food Safety
- Relation of Global Warming and Extreme Weather Condition
- Movie Review
- Admission Essay
- Annotated Bibliography
- Application Essay
- Article Critique
Article Review
- Article Writing
- Book Review
- Business Plan
- Business Proposal
- Capstone Project
- Cover Letter
- Creative Essay
- Dissertation
- Dissertation - Abstract
- Dissertation - Conclusion
- Dissertation - Discussion
- Dissertation - Hypothesis
- Dissertation - Introduction
- Dissertation - Literature
- Dissertation - Methodology
- Dissertation - Results
- GCSE Coursework
- Grant Proposal
- Marketing Plan
- Multiple Choice Quiz
- Personal Statement
- Power Point Presentation
- Power Point Presentation With Speaker Notes
- Questionnaire
- Reaction Paper
- Research Paper
- Research Proposal
- SWOT analysis
- Thesis Paper
- Online Quiz
- Literature Review
- Movie Analysis
- Statistics problem
- Math Problem
- All papers examples
- How It Works
- Money Back Policy
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Policy
- Donate Paper
- We Are Hiring
Article Review Examples
Search by keywords
Paper Categories
739 Article Review examples are found
Three Ways Ceos Can Lay the Foundation for Leadership Development, Article Review Example
The article espouses the need for CEOs to establish team leaders. The journey toward becoming a CEO is quite long and requires dedication and hard work, as espoused by Davtyan. [...]
Pages: 4
Words: 971
Analyzing Political Violence During Contention I, Article Review Example
Analyzing Political Violence during Contention I Political violence happens when a state conflicts with another country that violates or threatens the freedom of its civilians. Political violence can occur in [...]
Pages: 6
Words: 1763
Common Cold Defending Children Against COVID-19, Article Review Example
The primary risk for SARS-CoV-2 severity clinically is a person’s biological age (O’Driscoll et al., 2020). Although comorbidities become more intense with age, increasing the likelihood of developing a serious [...]
Words: 1227
Hero Narrative Reading Strategy, Article Review Example
Several models can be implemented to enhance reading results and communicative purposes. Hero narrative strategy is based on the communicative strategy for instructing college students in the art of academic [...]
Pages: 3
Words: 943
Website Reviews on the Myth of Minotaur, Article Review Example
Among the ancient Greek narratives on myths is where we draw the myth about Minotaur. Myths are historical events believed to have occurred in the source of the Greek myth [...]
Words: 693
Dissemination of Information in Poland, Article Review Example
Laws protect the rights of citizens of any country. Therefore, spreading information about the law is important because it will ensure that everyone who gets that information follows the law [...]
Pages: 2
Words: 587
Time is precious
don’t waste it!
It's a Free, No-Obligation Inquiry!
Plagiarism-free guarantee
Privacy guarantee
Secure checkout
Money back guarantee
Get a Free E-Book ($50 in value)
How To Write The Best Essay Ever!
Need a professionally written Custom Essay?
We will write it for you, in any discipline! Starting at only
$9.45 a page
Wait, please!
Right now, you can get a professionally written essay in any discipline with a
10% discount!
Please, check your email for the offer!
We're now sending you a link to download your e-book, please check your e-mail. Thank you!
Thank you for the subscription!
You can receive the notifications now. It's pleasure to stay in touch!
Get a Free E-Book ($50 in value)
Writing a Literature Review
- Library Services
- Meet the Library Team
- Off-Campus & Mobile Access
- Research Help
- What is a Literature Review?
- Step 1: Choosing a Topic
- Step 2: Finding Information
- Step 3: Evaluating Content
- Step 4: Taking Notes
- Step 5: Synthesizing Content
- Step 6: Writing the Review
- Step 7: Citing Your Sources
- Other Helpful Guides
Note Taking Tips!
- Notetaking Systems: California Polytechnic State University
At this point in the process, you have committed to a topic, found resources on it, and now are trying to glean information from those sources. The page linked above provides some note taking tips, ways to avoid plagiarism, and 5 different note taking styles (also described below). Pick the style that works best for you.
The Cornell Method
The outline method, the mapping method, the charting method, the sentence method.
- Cornell Learning Strategies Center Resources including Note-Taking Method
The Cornell Method uses a two-column approach to note taking.
- The first column measures about 2.5 inches.
- The second column (the larger of the two) measures about 6 inches.
- The larger column is the space to take your notes in.
- The smaller column is to be used to create cue words or keywords that describe the information they are taking notes about.
- At the very bottom of the sheet is a two-inch wide space used to summarize in one or two sentences the main concept or idea taken from the resource.
Cornell Notes - wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornell_Notes
- How to take Cornell notes - YouTube
The Outline Method is a very structed way of note-taking.
- The left side of the sheet contains general ideas.
- As you work your way to the right, the information grows increasely more detailed.
- The relationship between ideas and information is carried out through the indentation.
The Mapping Method is a very visual way of organizing your notes and information.
- It makes use of graphical representation of information content.
- It involves writing down the concept or terms and radiating the related ideas out of the center.
- You can use lines and symbols to build and link the related ideas.
- It can also be used as a way of brainstorming.
The Charting Method utilizes a chart-structure as a way of organizing your notes.
- Determine the points/topics/subjects that you are trying to find information about.
- Set up your paper in advance by columns headed by these points/topics/subjects.
- As you read through a source (a book, article, website, etc.), record information (words, phrases, main ideas, etc.) under the the appropriate column.
The Sentence Method is the most basic notes-taking method.
- As you research, write down any new ideas or bits of information as a sentence.
- Number each sentence as you move down the page.
- << Previous: Step 3: Evaluating Content
- Next: Step 5: Synthesizing Content >>
- Last Updated: Feb 27, 2023 11:16 AM
- URL: https://libguides.llu.edu/literaturereview
Please review and summarize article. Reference:...
Please review and summarize article.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/key-factors-make-hrcis-phr-certification-so-perfect-beginners-arora#:~:text=PHR%20Certification%20increases%20your%20value,the%20cherry%20on%20the%20cake.
Answer & Explanation
Unlock access to this and over 10,000 step-by-step explanations
Have an account? Log In
Step-by-step explanation
Get unstuck with a cliffsnotes subscription.
Related Q&A
- Q https://youtu.be/bYDuzL5zUL0 After viewing the video, you must communicate with members of your group and answer the fo... Answered 15d ago
- Q Write pages that explore thoughts of biomechanics and their relationship to performance & injury. Include a section ... Answered 43d ago
- Q Standard Deviations Sample Sizes Assume Equal Standard Deviations (Pooled) Do Not Assume Equal Standard Deviations (Not ... Answered over 90d ago
- Q Good afternoon, this is a 3part question. I have attached the needed resources. Please help me to solve all 3 parts. . F... Answered 81d ago
- Q please respond to this My name is Evelyn, I'm from San Diego, CA. I'm a mom of two (basically 3 if we include my husba... Answered 53d ago
- Q . Assignment-2 For Part I of the Assignment, please read the case "What Motivated Workers in the Face of a Pandemi... Answered over 90d ago
- Q . Suppose that we observe a single data point Y from a normal model Y ~ N(0. 6,) where the mean @ is unknown. We assume... Answered over 90d ago
- Q Integrated Learning Project: Write at least a two-page longer summary analyzing statistics used to support any argumen... Answered over 90d ago
- Q Explain to the new member of the research group that you are working in why it is possible to use blood and urine sample... Answered 27d ago
- Q nlooking for help with multiple choice and true or false econ questions. i rate thumbs up for correct answers. thank you... Answered 84d ago
- Q H.R.3755 - Women's Health Protection Act of 2021 Current status of the legislation: Examples include: if the bill has be... Answered over 90d ago
- Q 1) Producer surplus is: Select one: a.quantity supplied minus quantity demanded b.willingness to pay for a good minus th... Answered 86d ago
- Q Introduction New managers are often asked to fill supervisory positions without any formal training or guidel... Answered 25d ago
- Q . CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO COLLECT Mathematics Department SAN FRANCISC BOX L109 . 50 PHELAN AVENUE . SAN FRANCISCO... Answered 23d ago
- Q Joe works in a community centre where Susannah attends English language classes. She has three children who attend a pla... Answered 26d ago
- Q Bat forelimb Flight is arguably one of the most demanding modes of locomotion for mammals. As seen in this forelimb of... Answered 26d ago
- googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display('footerCliffsnotesAd'); }); CliffsNotes study guides are written by real teachers and professors, so no matter what you're studying, CliffsNotes can ease your homework headaches and help you score high on exams. About CliffsNotes
We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it.
- Essay Database >
- Essays Samples >
- Essay Types >
- Article Review Example
Science Article Reviews Samples For Students
175 samples of this type
Do you feel the need to check out some previously written Article Reviews on Science before you start writing an own piece? In this free directory of Science Article Review examples, you are given an exciting opportunity to examine meaningful topics, content structuring techniques, text flow, formatting styles, and other academically acclaimed writing practices. Implementing them while composing your own Science Article Review will definitely allow you to complete the piece faster.
Presenting superb samples isn't the only way our free essays service can aid students in their writing endeavors – our experts can also create from point zero a fully customized Article Review on Science that would make a solid foundation for your own academic work.
Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It Article Review Example
The characteristics of science article review example.
A. Article title and reference: Drought, River Fragmentation Forcing Endangered Fish out of Water, Biologist Finds. (June 6, 2013) http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/06/130606110013.htm
This Is An Attempt To Present Both Nature And Man As Creators And Inventors Article Review Samples
Idea machines examples.
Don't waste your time searching for a sample.
Get your article review done by professional writers!
Just from $10/page
Good Public Health Article Review Example
Complex scientific testimony: how do jurors make decision article reviews example, complex scientific testimony: how do jurors make decisions, expert testimony in psychology article reviews examples, science and technology article review, kolbs experiential learning cycle article review samples.
David Kolb developed the Experiential Learning Cycle theory in 1984. In his theory, Kolb explained that learning happens in four stage cycles and four separate learning styles where the recipient learns by undergoing the different knowledge phases from experience to reflection, followed by conceptualizing and ends with Action. The Experiential learning theory according to Kolb outlines learning as the process of gaining, assimilating, transforming and owning knowledge by interacting with the environment (Kolb, 1984, p. 41). These interactions include abstract, concrete, reflective and active participation forms of learning.
The learning process follows this basic model (Saul McLeod, 2013)
Example of japan's missing female scientists article review, good article review about the rise of mobile x-ray technology, how new is the new terrorism article review examples, public policy issue article review example, article review on an empirical analysis of trends in psychology.
Richard W. Robins, Samuel D. Gosling, and Kenneth H. Craik Psychology is a science, and as such, it uses the scientific method to explore previously unknown areas, while elaborating written reports to share with fellow peers and the general community, in order to guarantee its own progress. An important component of a modern psychologist then, is the ability to accurately read and interpret the works of others. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to critically analyze the paper entitled An Empirical Analysis of Trends in Psychology (Robins, Gosling, & Craik, 1999).
Research Question
Free drug addiction experiments based on both mass media and scholarly articles article review example, good article review about meditation and neuroscience, news summary article review example, summary of the article, example of article review on effects of exercise on glucose homeostasis, good has psychology failed article review example, article review: “has psychology failed” by jastrow, article review on human evolution in science textbooks, joys of science article review example, example of article review on principles of scientific management by frederick w. taylor, frederick w. taylor, principles of scientific management, 1912, classics of public administration article review sample, free article review on theoretical critique of a journal article, free article review on comparative politics, example of article review on comparative politics as part of political science, molecular biology article review examples, example of article review on science, example of thankfully, this sugar molecule seems to be a great promise for a world where obesity article review, parasitic worms may help treat diseases associated with obesity, free article review on peggs k 2010 nonhuman animal experiments in the european community human values, annotated bibliography, the origins of different emotions article review example, article review on the evolution of behavior by b f skinner, the role of dogma in research article review, an article review on the role dogma plays in research, example of the scientific method in management article review.
Scientific Method is a process which researchers utilize in exploring observing and carrying out the necessary experiments in a bid to ascertain the reliability of collected information relating to a specific phenomenon. Accordingly, the methodology usually entails four major steps. These steps include observation, hypothesis, predicting and experimenting. Observation is basically the studying and describing a particular trend while the second step involves the formulation of a theory that seeks to explain the experience.
Example Of Article Review On Can Language Style Matching Really Bring About New Long-Lasting Romances
Environmental issue article review sample, environmental issue.
Introduction Environmental Chemicals is one of the articles found in the Environmental Health Perspectives peer- reviewed professional journal. The article deals with the impacts of environmental chemicals to human health. This has been done through extensive bio monitoring programs, which have led to increased knowledge of human exposure to various chemicals found in the environment. The article reveals that low chemical doses can also be every dangerous to the life of human being.
Research problem
Experimental vaccine partially protects article review example, monkeys from hiv-like infection.
Microbiology: Journal Review
“Experimental Vaccine Partially Protects Monkeys from HIV-Like Infection” www.ScienceDaily.com
Many websites are available for serious researchers to access and share information. Unfortunately the mass media for the most part does not offer journalists with expertise in science. People are interested in the health of their families and need to know about medical research. The www.ScienceDaily.com is a website that offers the most recent research and scientific news in non-scientific language. This paper reviews an article from the ScienceDaily.com website. Three scientific research websites are evaluated.
Feedback & Reinforcement Article Review Example
Evolution has been defined by many a scientist, but the most notable one was Charles Darwin who formulated the famous evolutionary theory, and therefore referred to as the father of evolution. However, it is worth noting that even before Darwin, there were other theorists and scientists who had dwelt on the idea and whose thoughts could be integrated with those of Darwin to better understand the evolution. Some of these are discussed below.
Integumentary System Article Review
Article Review: Baldness Treatments May Mimic Animals' Winter Coats
Article Review On Functions Of The Placenta
Article review: your cells are my cells, free article review on ionized plasmas as cheap sterilizers for developing world.
Ionized plasma devices such as neon lights and plasma TVs can not only sterilize water but also enable it to kill bacteria for nearly a week after treatment, (Science daily 2011). Plasma is ionized gas (atoms have reduced number of electrons). In water, ionized plasma reacts with oxygen to form Ozone (ionized oxygen) which destroys most viruses and nearly all bacteria. Expensive sterilization methods such as bleach and antibiotics hinder the provision of quality healthcare in developing countries. Devices able to ionize plasma hold the solution to cheap sterilizing for the developing world.
Article Review On Psychology
Summary article for psy 140 2011, article review on gender and identity, quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature: a critical review article review, instructorquantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature: a critical review, free scientific management theory article review sample, the origin of old-earth geology and its ramifications for life in the 21st century article review examples.
(Institution Name)
Introduction:
Authors article review example, analytical methods to evaluate seed dormancy in legumes, good behaviorism article review example, assessing the need to use chimpanzees in behavioral and biomedical research: example article review by an expert writer to follow, free article review on greenhouse effect, good example of aquatic biotechnology article review, introduction 3.
History of Aquaculture 3 Aquaculture and biotechnology 4 Public response to Aqua-biotechnology 4 Ethical Implications of aqua-biotechnology 5 Sustainability of the environment 6 Preserving the existing species 7 Conclusion 8
References 9
Reading response article review, predictability of anthrax infection in the serengeti tanzania article review examples.
Each year, millions of mammals cross the Seregenti. The migration of the wildebeest is one of the greatest natural wonders of the world. But there is something not so wonderful in the Serengeti—an endemic disease called anthrax that strikes and kills without discrimination. It kills humans, livestock, and wildlife.
Race, Drugs And Incarceration In America Article Review Sample
Evolving genomic approaches to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: moving beyond genes article reviews examples, example of why are we so afraid of creativity by maria konnikova article review, good example of article review on close reading assignment for artworks course, example of article review on hospital staffing crisis, introduction, example of trial by fire article review, article review on evolution the reality of existence, evolution – the reality of existence, summary and cognitive psychological relevance article review, article 1 - worsening memory associated with later alzheimers disease.
Summary - This article briefly discusses how memory loss is associated with Alzheimer's disease, particularly, the way it progresses from mild to moderate towards severe. Studies have revealed that even though memory loss is connected to age it could be exclusive to certain predisposing conditions since everyone beyond 75 yrs of age is not affected by memory issues. (“Worsening Memory Associated,” 2011)
Password recovery email has been sent to [email protected]
Use your new password to log in
You are not register!
Short on a deadline?
Don't waste time. Get help with 11% off using code - GETWOWED
No, thanks! I'm fine with missing my deadline
Information
- Author Services
Initiatives
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
- Active Journals
- Find a Journal
- Proceedings Series
- For Authors
- For Reviewers
- For Editors
- For Librarians
- For Publishers
- For Societies
- For Conference Organizers
- Open Access Policy
- Institutional Open Access Program
- Special Issues Guidelines
- Editorial Process
- Research and Publication Ethics
- Article Processing Charges
- Testimonials
- Preprints.org
- SciProfiles
- Encyclopedia
Article Menu
- Recommended Articles
- Google Scholar
- on Google Scholar
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
Article Versions Notes
Bougea, A. Genetics of Multiple System Atrophy and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy: A Systemized Review of the Literature. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023 , 24 , 5281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065281
Bougea A. Genetics of Multiple System Atrophy and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy: A Systemized Review of the Literature. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2023; 24(6):5281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065281
Bougea, Anastasia. 2023. "Genetics of Multiple System Atrophy and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy: A Systemized Review of the Literature" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 6: 5281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065281
Article Metrics
Further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
‘The Last of Us’: A harsh world forces Ellie to grow up
Season 1, episode 8: ‘when we are in need’.
Note: My name is Gene Park. I’m a reporter covering gaming culture for The Washington Post. I’m following “The Last of Us” from the perspective of someone who has played all the games (more than once).
The famous winter section of the video game version of “The Last of Us” is finally here in the penultimate episode of Craig Mazin’s HBO adaptation.
We open with a shot of a lakeside resort town, and a preacher reading Revelations from the Bible to his flock of extremely sad and tired-looking people. A little girl asks when she’ll be able to bury her father. The preacher, named David, says it’ll have to wait till spring. David speaks to another follower named James outside, played by Troy Baker, who portrayed Joel Miller in the video games. David may seem like a run-of-the-mill preacher, but his interaction with James suggests an insidious side. When David asks James if he’s still “with me,” Baker’s James barely nods his head, letting out a weak “yeah.” Baker’s quiet acting here tells us that James is either scared of David, or beholden to him in a way that feels impossible to escape. The same seems to apply to the rest of David’s flock.
Joel is still recovering from the injury he sustained two episodes ago, and Ellie decides to hunt for food as they’ve been reduced to eating scraps of beef jerky. This entire hunting sequence is lifted from the video game, giving both players and viewers an opportunity to see Ellie awkwardly transition from prey to predator. To her disbelief — and thanks to Joel’s earlier training — she hits a deer. The deer’s corpse is discovered by David and James, who went hunting because their town’s rations are running low.
Before they can take the deer, Ellie holds them at gunpoint and demands they move away. David appears surprised at Ellie’s age — and probably her gender, too — since she was able to sneak up on both men silently. The ensuing negotiation sequence is also lifted line by line from the game, with Ellie attempted to trade for medicine. David asks James to go back to town. James’s face betrays the fact that he disagrees, but he plays along anyway, leaving David and Ellie alone in a nearby house to warm up beside a fire.
Here, David and Ellie get to know each other. In the game, this scene was interrupted by an action sequence with infected zombies. In the show, we instead get some background on David’s faith, and how he became a preacher. He claims to have found God after the world ended, and he left the Pittsburgh quarantine zone with a group of people; they eventually settled thousands of miles away at this location.
Then, David drops the bomb: The men who attacked Joel and Ellie in episode 6 were from his group, and the man who got his neck snapped by Joel was the father of that little girl from the episode’s beginning. James returns with the medicine but holds Ellie at gunpoint. David insists that James lower the gun and give Ellie the medicine. James questions David: Are they really going to let Ellie get away?
“The Last of Us” has been a great stage for acting with faces. Scott Shepherd’s David and Bella Ramsey’s Ellie both do exceptional work here. David’s smirks and wrinkles belie his true intentions, while you can clearly see Ellie’s guard being let down … before it comes right back up after the realization that she’s in trouble. Ellie quickly returns to Joel to inject his injury with penicillin. They snuggle together.
David returns to his town’s makeshift food hall, a former steakhouse, with the deer. His whole flock is quiet and he shoots a glance at James. It’s clear that James excitedly told everyone in town that they found their friend’s killer. David reassures everyone that they’ll seek justice, and then the little girl speaks up: “You should kill them,” she says. David slaps the girl with a vicious backhand, our first overt sign that David lords over these people with abuse and gaslighting. Everyone sits down and eats their meal. James continues to be uncomfortable, for reasons we’ll discover later.
David’s town is a sharp contrast to Tommy’s Jackson, Wyoming haven. In Jackson, where everyone shares everything, children laughed, engaged in art, and there was liquor, active shops and food. They were on the verge of raising hogs for bacon. Meanwhile, under David’s leadership, the children are crying, and the adults’ bodies are wiry from hunger. If Jackson is the picture of success, David’s group is a portrait of a failing society.
Morning comes, and David’s group has tracked Ellie back to the suburb where she and Joel are holed up. Ellie arms Joel with a knife; he still seems out of it and unable to fend for himself. Ellie rides on horseback and fires shots at the group to lure them away from Joel’s hiding place. This attempt fails, as James shoots the horse. James and the rest of David’s men intend to kill Ellie, but David stops them abruptly. He seems to care for Ellie’s well-being to some extent, and insists on bringing her back to town, while leaving some men to hunt for Joel.
A child in a dangerous world: Inside the creation of Ellie
Little do these men know that Joel has recovered, at least a bit. Fans of the game have complained that Joel feels less violent in the show than he was in the games, which makes sense; action games typically have their protagonists kill hundreds of people. But they should be pleased with this episode, in which Joel methodically and carefully dispatches the three men hunting him down. He immediately murders one of the men who was able to find his location.
Ellie awakens to find herself caged, under David’s gaze. David pleads with her to tell him her name, but Ellie refuses. David tries to work his magic, aiming to convince Ellie to join his group. He gaslights her, suggesting she has no other choice.
We switch back to Joel’s perspective as he incapacitates two more men looking for him. Here we have a mirror image of his episode 6 stickup with the Native American couple. In that scene, Joel was a bit more gentle. Here, we see the full extent of Joel’s “interrogation” methods. It’s just torture; this is yet another scene lifted straight from the game. This is the moment where it becomes crystal clear to the audience that Joel isn’t exactly a wholesome father. He murders both men — despite their cooperation. One has to wonder whether this outburst of violence comes from Joel realizing that he has been unable to protect Ellie, yet again.
We cut back to Ellie realizing that David’s group has been eating human flesh after she notices an ear — and other chunks of human flesh — on the floor. David claims its out of desperation and poor decision-making. Ellie interrogates David about his motivations. David said it was cordyceps, not God, that helped him teach the ways of the world. The fungal infection isn’t “evil,” he says; it is simply nature doing its job. This inspired David to take an “any means necessary” approach to surviving, which includes holding a “violent heart.”
David entreats Ellie to join him in leading the group. It feels like a warped mirror image of the FEDRA officer praising Ellie’s knack for “leadership.” He places his hand gently on Ellie’s, his pedophilic intentions laid bare. Ellie touches back — a deeply discomforting moment — before we realize Ellie is lulling David into a false sense of security. She breaks his finger and tries to take his keys but fails. David gives up on changing Ellie’s mind and leaves. Ellie realizes she’s got no way out of this.
While Joel heads toward the town in search of Ellie, David and James return to chop Ellie up into “tiny little pieces.” In another scene lifted from the game, Ellie’s fast thinking leads her to finally declare to strangers that she’s infected. It’s an admission so shocking it keeps the men from killing her, especially since Ellie was able to take a bite out of David while trying to escape. Distracted by how “real” her infection looks, James gets a butcher knife to the neck as Ellie escapes into the steakhouse.
With the doors locked, Ellie grabs a piece of burning wood to set fire to the steakhouse. David and Ellie play a fatal game of cat and mouse, a gameplay sequence taken straight from the game. The show mimics the gameplay of Ellie sneaking around silently and arming herself to attack David. David’s lines are also straight from the game, including: “No one who’s infected fights this hard to stay alive.” David then says that he’ll play as Ellie’s “father.” You can sense the outrage and disgust build up within Ramsey’s performance as she lashes out at David with a steak knife. She lands a stab, causing David to drop his machete.
David climbs on top of Ellie and clearly intends to sexually assault her. Ellie screams in terror, but she’s able to grab David’s machete and turns it on him. Ramsey’s Ellie loses herself completely as she stabs David dozens of times. Ellie’s face, and the camera, is doused in blood. Ramsey’s scream reminds the audience that she was once Lady Mormont of “Game of Thrones,” and if there were any doubts about her casting, Ramsey’s performance in this episode should finally erase them.
Ellie leaves the burning building in a daze, covered in blood. Joel finds her but Ellie screams in retaliation as she’s still in a primal mode of survival. Joel assures her — “It’s me” — and embraces her completely. He calls her “baby girl,” the same term of affection he held for Sarah. With Joel’s acceptance of Ellie as his daughter complete, the two walk off into the winter haze and the episode ends.
Some notes and observations:
- It was only implied in the game that David was some sort of cult leader. His pedophilia was just hinted at. Moments before his death in the show, however, Scott Shepherd’s David is clearly about to unzip his pants — a horrifying action that was not in the game. While he was easy to hate in the game, he is unforgivably detestable in the show, all while seeming more benevolent early in the episode.
- Troy Baker is clearly a talented actor, but his Southern drawl here sounds a bit close to the original Joel from the game. For veterans of the game, it’ll be amusing to hear the voice of Joel come from a completely different character.
- It’s also important to note that when Ellie kills David, in the game her stabbing is interrupted by Joel. In the show, Ellie is able to freely maul David’s body without Joel stopping her. It’s obvious that this decision was made to further reinforce that Ellie did not need Joel to “save” or “protect” her — not even from her own declining mental health. Ellie’s rage is displayed unabated and without a filter.
Last week’s recap:
Episode 7: “Left Behind”
Seattle, WA (98195)
Cloudy skies. High 49F. Winds E at 5 to 10 mph..
Cloudy skies with periods of rain late. Low 37F. Winds NE at 5 to 10 mph. Chance of rain 90%.
Updated: March 9, 2023 @ 12:55 pm
- Full Forecast
- Latest Edition
- Advertising
- Classifieds
- Courtesy of Stage Notes
- Copy article link
Review: ‘A Party at the End of the World’
A stage notes renaissance.
Sophie Dorey
- Mar 9, 2023
From March 2-4, Stage Notes, a student-run musical theater club at UW, presented “A Party at the End of the World: A Dave Malloy Experience” at the Samuel E. Kelly Ethnic Cultural Theater. The performance showcased music from “Natasha, Pierre & The Great Comet of 1812,” “Ghost Quartet,” “Preludes,” and “Octet.”
The original production was intended to be solely “Natasha, Pierre & The Great Comet of 1812,” but unfortunately, the RSO encountered issues securing rights for the music. Instead, Stage Notes transformed the show into a cabaret-style concert that took attendees on a journey through “Great Comet” creator Dave Malloy’s discography.
“The cast, being wonderful and great people, we all got together and sat down and tried to find a solution,” Evan Ponyah, a fourth-year at UW and the director of the show, said. “Our solution was, what we referred to in the cast as, ‘The Great Quartet of Octeen-Twelve.’”
The show began with an emotional ballad from “Preludes” before transitioning into music from “Ghost Quartet,” with each act beginning with a short plot introduction. The synergy and passion of the entire cast was obvious, presenting inside-jokes and laughs alongside the poignant performances. Ponyah said that post-pandemic, Stage Notes has had a uniquely inclusive community.
“There was a really unique renaissance of Stage Notes culture that I feel is a lot more equitable now …. This one that we have now is a lot more thoughtful and empathetic towards its members,” Ponyah said.
After an intermission, the cast jumped into “Prologue” from “Natasha, Pierre & The Great Comet of 1812,” with new costumes and a new vibrant energy as the actors interacted with the audience.
Sebastian Rojas-Rincon, a third-year art major, starred as the “dear, bewildered, and awkward” Pierre. Despite it being only his second production with Stage Notes, Rojas-Rincon brought a fiery passion to the performance.
Most Popular Stories
Kilbreath: it’s time for a change, get stickered: the case for more silliness on campus, uw drama’s adaptation of ‘the oresteia’ explores questions behind justice and humanity, review: seattle opera’s ‘a thousand splendid suns’, washington state lawmakers are working on making lunar new year a paid holiday.
“My first Stage Notes audition, I didn’t get into the production we were doing, and I was like, ‘You know, that’s fine,’” Rojas-Rincon said. “I went and saw the show, and it was amazing and encouraged me to get back in and audition. I got into [‘How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying’] and I was like, ‘This is the biggest slay I’ve ever been in.’”
Because of the rights issues, the “Great Comet” portion of the production featured music that had been individually written for the 14-person pit by Nick Franks, the music director.
Andrea Muljono, a fourth-year in computer science, was the rehearsal and pit pianist for the production, representing the academic range of the cast. As her fourth and final show with Stage Notes, Muljono found this production to be filled with some of the most talented people she has ever met.
“These students can not only sing incredibly difficult songs, they can also dance while doing it — while acting,” Muljono said. “It’s really like the three art worlds coming together, unified into one.”
Those interested in getting involved with Stage Notes, regardless of major or grade level, are welcome to audition for shows or participate in acting and improv workshops . Auditions for “Spring Awakening,” the RSO’s spring musical, take place March 8-10, and tickets for future productions can be found via Stage Notes’ Instagram .
“I totally encourage people to come to our shows just to see what they could be doing,” Muljono said. “Stage Notes is really open about allowing anyone from any background or major to come and do music.”
Reach writer Sophie Dorey at [email protected] . Twitter: @soap_avi
Like what you’re reading? Support high-quality student journalism by donating here .
More Like This
Make believe: seattle’s debut genre film festival.
- By Piper Davidson The Daily
This year’s Seattle Jewish Film Festival is a ‘cinemanna’ of film, food, and music
- By Alison Jean Smith Contributing writer
- By Sophie Dorey The Daily
Winter 2023: Best of Concert Photography
- Maddy Grassy , Leah Ellsworth , Chloe Peterson , Claire Ke
- Stage Notes
- A Party At The End Of The World
- Natasha, Pierre & The Great Comet Of 1812
- Ghost Quartet
- Musical Theater
Get email notifications on {{subject}} daily!
{{description}}
Email notifications are only sent once a day, and only if there are new matching items.
Followed notifications
Please log in to use this feature, post a comment as anonymous.
- [whistling]
- [tongue_smile]
- [thumbdown]
- [happybirthday]
Your comment has been submitted.
There was a problem reporting this.
Watch this discussion. Stop watching this discussion.
(0) comments, welcome to the discussion..
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything. Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person. Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts. Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.
- Notifications
Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.
Breaking News
Top news articles, top arts articles, top opinion articles, top sports articles, stay up to date.
Subscribe to our weekly newsletters covering the news, arts, and sports.
Subscribe to our Newsletters
- Regular (M, W, F)
Support Student News
Serving the UW community since 1891.
Ads are being blocked by your browser.
Please disable your ad blocker, whitelist our site, or consider donating to support The Daily
Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 Review: A Surface-like Slate for Less
The latest hybrid XPS isn't as expensive as the Microsoft Surface it apes, but parts of it aren't as good, either.
The newest XPS 13 two-in-one from Dell looks and feels a lot like the Surface Pro from Microsoft . Yes, there are many other Windows tablets with clip-on keyboards, but the Surface is the original and still best known, so it's the one you're most likely to compare with this.
I've always been a fan of the XPS line in general, and specifically the XPS 13 clamshell laptops . This two-in-one version has some of the same aesthetically minimalist touches and mod-feeling matte aluminum body. Even better, it costs a good deal less than a comparable Surface Pro, depending on how you configure each system.
XPS 13 Two-in-One
- Less expensive than some competing products
- Fanless, silent operation
- Excellent keyboard feel
- Kickstand implementation is poor
- Keyboard lies perfectly flat
- No headphone jack
A Surface Pro 9 with a Core i5 CPU, 16GB of RAM and a 256GB SSD, along with the keyboard cover, is $1,578. A similarly configured XPS 13 two-in-one, also with the keyboard cover, is $1,299. And that's with a bigger 512GB SSD, too. An exact comparison is tough because the Surface Pro 9 doesn't offer a pairing of Core i5 and 512GB, while the XPS 13 two-in-one offers only 512GB and 1TB storage options. Prices can also change regularly with limited time discounts and deals. (As of this review, the Surface Pro 9 is offering a free keyboard cover for a limited time, a savings of $179.)
There's also an ARM-based Surface Pro 9 (the model we reviewed) that uses Microsoft's SQ3 chip instead of one from Intel and adds 5G support, but there's no comparable XPS two-in-one option for that.
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1
Keyboard and kickstand sins.
But configured as closely as possible, there's a pretty big price difference. Still, I'm still not sure I would go with the XPS two-in-one over the Surface Pro 9. Why? Because the two things the Surface has perfected about tablet/laptop hybrids, the kickstand and the keyboard cover, are not quite as perfected here.
And that's a shame because the 13-inch 2,880x1,920 screen is bright and rich-looking. It's rated for 500 nits brightness, and in practice it makes for a very good TV/movie streaming device when lying in bed. The Surface Pro supports a faster 120Hz refresh rate, versus just 60Hz here. That can mean smoother video, but also have an impact on battery life. Having a higher, or variable, refresh rate is a nice feature to have, but most people will be happy with a 60Hz screen.
But the keyboard cover, which Dell calls the XPS Folio, is a letdown. I'll start with the good news: It's just $100 extra, not the criminal $179 Microsoft charges for its keyboard cover. But unlike the Surface keyboard, which can angle up at the back for a more ergonomic experience, the Dell version sits flat on your desk and that's it. The actual keys are large, flat, edge-to-edge-style keys, which is a good use of limited space, and in fact, it feels more like a solid laptop keyboard than the Surface version. But, the lack of any kind of incline option made it feel awkward.
A far bigger sin is how the kickstand is incorporated into the XPS Folio itself, instead of being built into the tablet. That means to prop up the XPs 13 two-in-one, you need the full keyboard cover attached, even if you just want to prop the tablet up like a standalone screen. While the Surface Pro allows for almost unlimited kickstand angles, the back of the XPs Folio slides down into three magnetic stops, and it's entirely possible none of them will feel exactly right to you.
Fanless performance
Once you get past these design foibles, the XPs 13 two-in-one is a respectable performer for a U-series Core i5 Windows system. It's fanless, which makes it totally silent and helps battery life, even if it's a theoretical limiter on overall performance because the heat needs to be regulated.
A current M2 MacBook is faster, as is the Core i7 XPS 13 Plus and the most recent Core i5 XPS 13, but not by a huge amount. I'd call this a perfectly fine PC for mainstream tasks and even some photo or video work.
Battery life is also nearly 7.5 hours on our online video streaming test. Again, nowhere near what some other laptops with bigger batteries can pull off, but still very good if you're going to be doing a lot of video streaming.
This see-sawing list of pluses and minuses leave the XPS 13 two-in-one in a strange place. The price is right, considering the components, accessories, design and performance. But in some of the quality of life issues, it falls behind the more expensive Surface Pro line, and you'll have to decide if the price tradeoff is worth it for the kickstand and keyboard differences.
Geekbench 5 (multicore)
Cinebench r23 (multicore), online streaming battery drain test, system configurations, the best laptops in every category.
- Best Laptop for 2023
- Best Windows Laptops
- Best Laptop for College
- Best Laptop for High School Students
- Best Budget Laptop Under $500
- Best Dell Laptops
- Best 15-Inch Work and Gaming Laptops
- Best 2-in-1 Laptop
- Best HP Laptops
- Best Gaming Laptop
- Best Cheap Gaming Laptop Under $1,000
- Best Chromebook: 8 Chromebooks Starting at Under $300
- Give this article Give this article Give this article
Margaret Atwood Is Still Sending Us Notes From the Future
Her new story collection, “Old Babes in the Wood,” offers elegiac scenes from a marriage plus a grab bag of curious fables.
Margaret Atwood’s new book is “Old Babes in the Wood.” Credit... Arden Wray for The New York Times
Supported by
Send any friend a story
As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can read what you share.
By Rebecca Makkai
- March 3, 2023
- Apple Books
- Barnes and Noble
- Books-A-Million
When you purchase an independently reviewed book through our site, we earn an affiliate commission.
OLD BABES IN THE WOOD: Stories, by Margaret Atwood
There are authors we turn to because they can uncannily predict our future; there are authors we need for their skillful diagnosis of our present; and there are authors we love because they can explain our past. And then there are the outliers: those who gift us with timelines other than the one we’re stuck in, realities far from home. If anyone has proved, over the course of a long and wildly diverse career, that she can be all four, it’s Margaret Atwood.
We’ve recently been reminded of her gifts as a futurist: Since Roe v. Wade was overturned last year, “ The Handmaid’s Tale ” (1985) has begun to feel, at least in the United States, less like a story of a bullet dodged than like an eerie foretoken of our not-too-distant fate.
Yet Atwood is equally lauded for novels like “Cat’s Eye” (1988) and the Booker Prize-winning “ The Blind Assassin ” (2000), which sweep us through the 20th century, shedding light on both collective and personal pasts.
Her short stories, like her novels, are as likely to be set in the ancient world or in 1930s Toronto as on a post-apocalyptic Earth. If you consider yourself an Atwood fan and have only read her novels: Get your act together. You’ve been missing out.
“Old Babes in the Wood,” the Canadian author’s ninth story collection — the first since “ Stone Mattress ” (2014) — comprises three sections: “Tig and Nell,” “My Evil Mother” and “Nell and Tig.” The first and last, seven stories in total, give us episodes from the marriage of a couple with grown children, taking us more or less chronologically up to Tig’s death and Nell’s life alone, which she likens to “being a student again … the same formless anxiety, the same bare-bones meals.” Even before Tig’s departure, loss suffuses these stories — the loss of a neighbor, of a beloved cat, of Tig’s father. They’re stories that look backward.
While that perspective isn’t new for Atwood, the lens seems to have changed. The characters in “Stone Mattress” looked back in bitterness or bemusement or nostalgia or even revenge — but here, people look back in grief.
The collection is dedicated in part to Atwood’s husband, Graeme Gibson, who died in 2019. While Tig’s and Nell’s lives bear the glaze of invented details, stories like “Widows,” a short piece that’s simply a letter from Nell describing life after Tig’s death, feel immensely personal.
“Widows” is addressed to a friend who’s “much younger, although you don’t think so now.” But there’s a subtle sense in quite a few of these stories that they’re directed at a younger self — someone flummoxed by and unprepared for the changes of later life, someone who can only liken widowhood to student aimlessness. (Isn’t it odd, how aging turns out not to happen to old people, but to those who were so recently young?)
Given that the majority of her readership is younger than the 83-year-old author, the effect, even if unintended, of many stories here is that of wisdom from the advance guard. These are missives not from a speculative future, but from one we’re all headed for, if we’re lucky enough to survive. It’s a new kind of futurism from Atwood: calling back from just up the road, letting us know what lies in store.
It’s tempting to consider only Tig and Nell’s seven stories as one complete collection, in part because the nine middle pieces are so disconnected from the rest, and in part because while that middle section contains some of the strongest and most original stories, it also contains the wobbliest.
What a blast to relay their topics! A mother believes herself to be a witch; a snail’s soul fuses with that of a customer service representative; Hypatia of Alexandria tells a modern audience about her murder via clamshell; an alien, hired to entertain quarantined Earthlings during a pandemic, turns the legend of Patient Griselda into an unintentionally (for the alien) hilarious story of vengeance. The alien tells of a duke saddling up and riding to the rescue astride a snack. “Why are you all laughing?” he asks his audience. “What do you think snacks do before they become snacks?”
A number of these middle stories refer to Covid — either as a fact of the world (in “Bad Teeth,” two women have tea in the backyard because “at their age you have to be careful”) or a topic of conversation (in “The Dead Interview,” Atwood herself interrogates George Orwell through a psychic medium, and when he asks what she means by “anti-vaxxers” she answers, “It’s complicated”). In addition to the ambiguous “plague” that has led to quarantine in “Impatient Griselda,” there’s the disease in “Freeforall” that is “communicable through any sort of moist contact, including kissing,” and has forced humans into isolated groups where marriage is arranged. While it works as a story, this piece feels more like the prospectus of a novel that Atwood or one of her acolytes might one day develop — a world that deserves more than the 10 pages it’s allotted here.
A few of these middle stories reach for the present moment in other ways: The characters in “Airborne: A Symposium” struggle with changing mores in academia (“I find triggering triggering,” one says) while also reminiscing about fights in previous decades (“over womyn with a Y”). That particular story works beautifully in its bewildered juxtaposition of past and present feminism, but other pieces seem less committed to the project of examining the present world they invoke. The Covid invocations feel tacked on, and it’s in their somewhat unconvincing attempts at timeliness that these middle stories miss as often as they hit. They don’t feel carefully curated so much as collected from the disparate corners of Atwood’s mind.
On the other hand: Who cares?
Who on earth ever loved Margaret Atwood for her cautious restraint? She swings at all pitches, and sometimes she misses. (Her 2015 novel “ The Heart Goes Last ” lost me at the Elvis sex bots, but good God, it was fun.)
I’d be more tempted to dwell on the puzzle of that grab bag of middle stories being sandwiched between realistic, virtuosic, elegiac linked stories if the reasoning didn’t so simply present itself: This is Atwood. This is our four-faced Janus, who’s got one face turned to the past, one to the present, one to the future and the fourth inside a spaceship, telling stories about eating horses. Long may she reign.
Rebecca Makkai’s latest novel is “I Have Some Questions for You.” She was a Pulitzer Prize finalist for her 2018 book “The Great Believers.”
OLD BABES IN THE WOOD: Stories | By Margaret Atwood | 257 pp. | Doubleday | $30
Advertisement
Mario Strikers: Battle League Scores New Update, Here Are The Full Patch Notes
Available now
- by Jim Norman 12 hours ago
It looks like Nintendo has finished with the big character-adding updates for Mario Strikers: Battle League after Bowser Jr. and Birdo were added back in December 2022. This doesn't mean, however, that the game will now sit update-free for the rest of time, as proven by Nintendo's latest patch to remove some pesky crashes.
It looks like there were a couple of bugs in the game up until recently, though the main one (nay, the only one that Nintendo officially discloses) seems to have been a result of an unfortunate Stadium theme and character pairing.
While the notes do not officially state which lineups were a problem for the game, this issue appears to have now been fixed. You can find this and (a little) more in the rather brief patch notes below:
Mario Strikers: Battle League ver. 1.3.2 (Released 8th March, 2023)
Issues Fixed
- Fixed an issue in which certain combinations of Stadium Themes and characters could cause the game to crash.
- Fixed several other issues to improve the gameplay experience.
Bit short, innit? For a reminder of our thoughts on the game, check out the full review below:
Are you still enjoying Mario Strikers on Switch? Take a shot at the comments to let us know.
[source en-americas-support.nintendo.com ]
About Jim Norman
Be it rambling about video games or superheroes, Jim wears his passions on his sleeve. Usually found replaying a Zelda title instead of working through his ever-growing backlog, he is a huge fan of all-things fantasy and likes nothing more than to chat about it.
- Author Profile
Comments ( 20 )
- 12 hours ago
Such a wasted opportunity. What is it with these half baked, feature missing Mario sport games of late? Golf, tennis, football. So poor.
- Toads-Friend
- 11 hours ago
Mario Tennis Aces was brilliant...but the others were awful. Nintendo Switch Sports is boring too!
- RainbowGazelle
It was literally an open goal to put the best football game on Switch, Nintendo. How did you miss?!
Short (and barely useful) patch notes is par for the course with Nintendo. It might be only me and a handful of people but I'm a nerd for reading patch notes and trying to imagine how the code works and how they fixed it
Nintendo Life is also experiencing some crashes right now that need patching. This website crashes on me a lot, actually.
- 10 hours ago
Bought this in December played for about a week solid and haven’t touched it since used to love Mario sports games but the ones available on switch are average at best think I had golf for about 2 days before getting fed up with it and selling it so glad I didn’t buy any digitally
- John_Deacon
Its hard to say how much I hate this game, how much I hate the fact that I paid 60 dollars for it, how much I hate it for offering virtually nothing besides good graphics and animation. With three more updates it's gonna reach one complete inch of content. The shallowest ever. And believe me, I don't wanna hate it that much
@Not_Soos yeah it’s taken about 5 attempts this morning to get the site to load time extension has had the same problem as well for me
man this game blows. mario sports on switch already do that thing where they add one new gimmick + online to justify cutting modes and content. this game gimmick is having less of everything
- NotTelevision
I played this one for over 30 hours beating the cups and competing online. Lack of features and modes is an issue, but the actual feel of the game and how it plays (once getting past the initial learning curve) is fantastic. For me this is one of the best arcade sports titles ever made. If it had a richer campaign it would without a question be the best.
@John_Deacon Mechanically speaking the game is actually quite intricate though. I would’ve liked more of a single-player mode, but the thing runs and looks beautifully on the Switch and it was fine-tuned and play tested to death. Like the best Mario sports games, each match is a rollercoaster of emotions and teams can come back from 4 to 5 point deficits if they use what is available.
- 9 hours ago
bought it at launch... and sold after a month... it's a very good demo...
Buying physical copies of these games is the way. Play for a bit, sell after a bit.
- GoldenSunRM
- 8 hours ago
@NotTelevision I actually agree with you. But that is more of a reason to be disappointed with this game.
The base gameplay is sooooooo good that is absurd that it's so barebones.
I just played it yesterday and while I don’t think it’s worth $60 I still had a good time
- 7 hours ago
Ha. Why did I even check the comments. We all know the response to whoever utters the name of this game.
The Gamecube version was so much better.
- GogGogGogGog
- 6 hours ago
Love how all the comment sections for Mario strikers articles consist of people talking abt how this game was missed potential and Mario sports games not being finished at launch
- 4 hours ago
I think I like strikers more than golf and tennis on the switch. It really shines in couch coop. But I also haven’t played too many hours of it
- Circasurviver
- 3 hours ago
Me and my kids have a great time playing this game together, I guess I’m the only one.
Tap here to load 20 comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...
Related Articles
50 Best Nintendo Switch Games So Far
The very best Switch games ever (so far)
Pokémon HOME Updated To Version 2.1.1, Here Are The Full Patch Notes
Adds Scarlet and Violet competition information
Nintendo Reveals Official MAR10 Day Switch Console Bundle
Includes red Joy-Con and a one of three digital Mario games
Nintendo Expands Its Switch Online Game Boy Advance Service March 9th
Samus returns in Metroid Fusion
Surprise! Fire Emblem Engage's 'Wave 3' Expansion Pass DLC Is Releasing Soon
Update: Here's a first look
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Writing the Article Review 1 Come up with a title. This title should reflect the focus of your review. Decide between a declarative title, descriptive title, or interrogative title. [9] 2 Cite the article. Under the title, place a complete citation of the article in the proper style. [10] Go to the next line to begin your essay.
What Is an Article Review That is a type of professional paper writing which demands a high level of in-depth analysis and a well-structured presentation of arguments. It is a critical, constructive evaluation of literature in a particular field through summary, classification, analysis, and comparison.
An article review is a writing piece that summarizes and assesses someone else's article. It entails understanding the central theme of the article, supporting arguments, and implications for further research. A review has specific guidelines and format to write. It can be either a critical review or a literature review.
Journal Article Review Notes SLIDE 1+2-Read journal, article title, and authors off the slide SLIDE 3-This journal article discussed online dating, which has been increasing in recent years-It discussed that there are many different stages and transitions in relationships, regardless of the relationship being, in person, long distance, online, etc.-The article particularly was interested in ...
Review articles in academic journals that analyze or discuss researches previously published by others, rather than reporting new research results or findings. Summaries and critiques are two ways to write a review of a scientific journal article.
To do this, we recommend take notes, annotating, and reading the article several times before critiquing. As you read, be sure to note important items like the thesis, purpose, research questions, hypotheses, methods, evidence, key findings, major conclusions, tone, and publication information.
The main part of how to write a review of an article is writing your critique. Refer to your outline and summary to draft several paragraphs evaluating the effectiveness of the writer's arguments. You should address whether the article was useful, thorough, and clear in explaining the subject.
An article review is a common academic assignment where you summarize and assess another person's article. In this type of assignment, you read a specific article, evaluate it critically, and write your observations in the review. The main purpose of writing the article review is to: Explore the strong and weak points
An article review is an evaluation and summary of someone else's work, and it has a particular format and some guidelines to write, which you have to follow to review an article. Here, in this blog, we will provide you a complete guide on how to write an article review. Reviewing an article is essential
When reviewing notes, you take, develop the habit of extracting the five big ideas that you learn, then practice combining the ideas. Don't restrict yourself to only combining the ideas from the books you read. Final Thoughts: Review Notes Regularly
{the act of annotating, making notes, commenting upon} • There are a few major ways to take notes (mapping, outlining, 2-column, word-for-word), but this is a personal style choice. Try different ways, but use the one that fits you best, and engages you in the topic. • Pay attention to what each section is about. The Abstract,
An article review is a piece of writing where you summarize and assess another person's article. It entails a logical evaluation of the central theme of the article, supporting arguments and implications for further research. It is essential to understand the main points and arguments of the article for accuracy during summation.
総説・調査論文 (Review article, Survey article) 総説はすでに発表された複数の論文をもとに作成された、いわばまとめ的な論文です。 通常は特定のテーマ (広範なものから詳細なものまで様々)のもと、そのテーマに精通している専門家が著名・有力な論文を集めて研究の過去と現状、展望を体系的にまとめて紹介するような形をとっていることが多いです。 システマティックレビュー (系統的レビュー:systematic review)は、これまで蓄積された研究成果の中から客観的な基準に合致する論文を選択し、内容を比較・分析することによって、新しい結果や解釈を提示するような調査論文的な性格をもつ論文です。
The purpose of an article review is associated with values that people attach to opinions from others about certain information in a given field. It is also a crucial skill for journalists as they have to gather information on a given topic and to further assess how the audience views their work.
Article Review View full sample Analyzing Political Violence During Contention I, Article Review Example Analyzing Political Violence during Contention I Political violence happens when a state conflicts with another country that violates or threatens the freedom of its civilians. Political violence can occur in [...] Pages: 6 Words: 1763
The first column measures about 2.5 inches. The second column (the larger of the two) measures about 6 inches. The larger column is the space to take your notes in. The smaller column is to be used to create cue words or keywords that describe the information they are taking notes about. At the very bottom of the sheet is a two-inch wide space ...
The article highlights five key reasons why the PHR certification is so beneficial for beginners. Firstly, the certification increases one's value in the job market and provides a competitive edge over other job seekers. Secondly, it helps in developing skills and knowledge that are essential for a successful career in human resources.
The authors note the recent Supreme Court decision that current legal standards for admission of scientific evidence also apply to other expert testimony based on 'training, experience and other sources of expertise besides empirical support ' (Youngstrom & Busch, 2000). ... Article Review: Your cells are my cells ---- Cell transfer during ...
This short note provides step-by-step guidelines to write a review article or a book chapter. I explain in particular a convenient method to build the abstract by writing short conclusions at...
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Note: My name is Gene Park. I'm a reporter covering gaming culture for The Washington Post. I'm following "The Last of Us" from the perspective of someone who has played all the games ...
A Stage Notes renaissance. From March 2-4, Stage Notes, a student-run musical theater club at UW, presented "A Party at the End of the World: A Dave Malloy Experience" at the Samuel E. Kelly ...
A review text should enclose a complete list of references that are cited in the text. 4 During writing of review paper, researcher should keep in mind about readers' approaches (i.e ...
Dan Ackerman/CNET. And that's a shame because the 13-inch 2,880x1,920 screen is bright and rich-looking. It's rated for 500 nits brightness, and in practice it makes for a very good TV/movie ...
Hover over the Note Center tab in the navigation bar, and select the appropriate Note Center from the drop-down.. Note: This workflow works for all Note types. Enter the Date Range for the dates of service for the Notes you would like to review.; Use the Note Status drop-down, and select To Be Reviewed from the list.; Use the show drop-down to select how many notes you would like to view on ...
You've been missing out. "Old Babes in the Wood," the Canadian author's ninth story collection — the first since " Stone Mattress " (2014) — comprises three sections: "Tig and ...
For a reminder of our thoughts on the game, check out the full review below: Related Articles Review Mario Strikers: Battle League - Simply The Best Sports Game On Switch