cesar chavez magazine article rhetorical analysis

Rhetorical Analysis Definition and Examples

The analysis can be used on any communication, even a bumper sticker.

An Introduction to Punctuation

Sample Rhetorical Analyses

Examples and observations, analyzing effects, analyzing greeting card verse, analyzing starbucks, rhetorical analysis vs. literary criticism.

Rhetorical analysis is a form of criticism or close reading that employs the principles of rhetoric to examine the interactions between a text, an author, and an audience . It's also called rhetorical criticism or pragmatic criticism.

Rhetorical analysis may be applied to virtually any text or image—a speech , an essay , an advertisement, a poem, a photograph, a web page, even a bumper sticker. When applied to a literary work, rhetorical analysis regards the work not as an aesthetic object but as an artistically structured instrument for communication. As Edward P.J. Corbett has observed, rhetorical analysis "is more interested in a literary work for what it does than for what it is."

"[A] complete rhetorical analysis requires the researcher to move beyond identifying and labeling in that creating an inventory of the parts of a text represents only the starting point of the analyst's work. From the earliest examples of rhetorical analysis to the present, this analytical work has involved the analyst in interpreting the meaning of these textual components—both in isolation and in combination—for the person (or people) experiencing the text. This highly interpretive aspect of rhetorical analysis requires the analyst to address the effects of the different identified textual elements on the perception of the person experiencing the text. So, for example, the analyst might say that the presence of feature x will condition the reception of the text in a particular way. Most texts, of course, include multiple features, so this analytical work involves addressing the cumulative effects of the selected combination of features in the text." (Mark Zachry, "Rhetorical Analysis" from " The Handbook of Business Discourse , " Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini, editor)

"Perhaps the most pervasive type of repeated-word sentence used in greeting card verse is the sentence in which a word or group of words is repeated anywhere within the sentence, as in the following example:

In quiet and thoughtful ways , in happy and fun ways , all ways , and always , I love you.

In this sentence, the word ways is repeated at the end of two successive phrases, picked up again at the beginning of the next phrase, and then repeated as part of the word always . Similarly, the root word all initially appears in the phrase 'all ways' and is then repeated in a slightly different form in the homophonic word always . The movement is from the particular ('quiet and thoughtful ways,' 'happy and fun ways'), to the general ('all ways'), to the hyperbolic ('always')." (Frank D'Angelo, "The Rhetoric of Sentimental Greeting Card Verse." Rhetoric Review )

"Starbucks not just as an institution or as a set of verbal discourses or even advertising but as a material and physical site is deeply rhetorical...Starbucks weaves us directly into the cultural conditions of which it is constitutive. The color of the logo, the performative practices of ordering, making, and drinking the coffee, the conversations around the tables, and the whole host of other materialities and performances of/in Starbucks are at once the rhetorical claims and the enactment of the rhetorical action urged. In short, Starbucks draws together the tripartite relationships among place, body, and subjectivity. As a material/rhetorical place, Starbucks addresses and is the very site of a comforting and discomforting negotiation of these relationships." (Greg Dickinson, "Joe's Rhetoric: Finding Authenticity at Starbucks." Rhetoric Society Quarterly )

"What essentially are the differences between literary criticism analysis and rhetorical analysis? When a critic explicates Ezra Pound's Canto XLV , for example, and shows how Pound inveighs against usury as an offense against nature that corrupts society and the arts, the critic must point out the 'evidence'—the 'artistic proofs' of example and enthymeme [a formal syllogistic argument that is incompletely stated}—that Pound has drawn upon for his fulmination. The critic will also call attention to the 'arrangement' of the parts of that argument as a feature of the 'form' of the poem just as he may inquire into the language and syntax. Again these are matters that Aristotle assigned mainly to rhetoric...

"All critical essays dealing with the persona of a literary work are in reality studies of the 'Ethos' of the 'speaker' or 'narrator'—the voice—source of the rhythmic language which attracts and holds the kind of readers the poet desires as his audience, and the means this persona consciously or unconsciously chooses, in Kenneth Burke's term, to 'woo' that reader-audience." (Alexander Scharbach, "Rhetoric and Literary Criticism: Why Their Separation." College Composition and Communication )

Watch Now: How to Write a Thesis Statement

cesar chavez magazine article rhetorical analysis

By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.

Rhetorical Analysis Of Cesar Chavez Speech

Cesar chavez father.

In 1965, a Filipino union group called The Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee “struck when the Delano grape growers cut the pay rates during harvest” (Rick Tejada-Flores PBS). Because of this, the strike went on, and Chavez became the leader, according to PBS. As a result, the grape strike began and lasted for five years (Encyclopedia of World Biography). Because Chavez learned writings from St. Francis and Gandhi, he decided to put that into play. According to PBS, Chavez’ group would fight without the use of violence. Also found in PBS, it states that many people went around asking them to stop buying grapes for the farmers’

Cesar Chavez Characteristics

Cesar Chavez was a profoundly excellent leader that changed the lives of thousands of immigrant labor workers. Labor Unions have been a fundamental part of the lives of labor workers all throughout history and in these groups the marginalized people experienced exploitation and discrimination. The businesses increased their profits by over working and not providing basic labor rights to the workers such as hygiene. Chavez empathized with the workers since he experienced the hardships of being overworked and not being paid fairly. For this he stayed committed to society and took many actions against the injustices. He believed in better working conditions for the farmworkers which led him to start huge protests to get to his goal. In order to better the lives of these immigrant people Chavez displayed bravery to do what no else had the courage to do, to help others, and for that reason he displayed exceptional leader characteristics. He wasn’t afraid to stand by his views and throughout his fight for civil rights he displayed vision, concern and courage, which later led to a better future for the farmworkers.

Historians Support Cesar Chavez

This article is a great primary source. It contains a series of interviews conducted by Bob Fitch with Cesar Chavez. It focuses on the grape boycott of California and the tactics Chavez used. Bob Fitch visited Cesar Chavez and the farm workers and explained their plight. The words of the workers were important in supporting the thesis of this research. This article focuses on why Chavez did what he did, why he took matters into his own hands, and risked everything he had to help the migrant farm workers. This was a very valuable source for that reason. The article gave me a look at the life of a farm worker and the need for reform from

Cesar Chavez's Argument On Nonviolent Resistance

Cesar Chavez on the tenth anniversary of Dr.Martin Luther King, Jr's assassination, wrote an article in a religious organization's magazine. In his article, he accentuates his argument on nonviolent resistance. By the use of specific examples and rhetorical devices. He appeals to his crowd and provides his argument as to why nonviolence should be used to accomplish their goals. One of the specific examples being that Dr.Kings life exemplifies the farm workers movement. Dr.Kings death giving them the opportunity to remember the principles of which their struggle has matured. Further, into the article, he infers that the use of nonviolence poses the opposite effect of violence. The effect being the attraction of support from people that would

Cesar Chavez Ethos Pathos Logos

He insists on the fact that inhumane vengeance will lead to injury and death, as well as “demoralization”. This argument is greatly supported by the death of Dr. King Jr; his view of nonviolence helped to grow and mature the farm worker’s movement. Civil workers are guilted into supporting their fallen hero in order to fulfill his dying wish. Chavez instructs them to “overcome… [their] frustrations” and support their causes through methods of peaceful protests. Chavez, appealing to their sense of emotion, manages to persuade a disconnected society by desperately wanting to avenge Dr. King’s untimely

Cesar Chavez Research Paper

One of Chavez’s most well-known protests is the Delano Grape Strike. Chavez is well known for this individual strike because he was specifically asked from the Filipinos, who were the peoples that were affected so they started the strike because of bad pay (90 cents an hour) and horrible working conditions. Cesar accepted the invitation from the Filipinos because he felt as though this strike could have been helpful towards his protesting causes. This strike focused on the pay, working conditions, and the land owner’s violent actions towards the farm workers. Cesar new the fight for these rights was not going to end anytime soon. The most challenging factor in this strike was keeping all the other farm workers fighting for their right as Mexican American farm workers. Some of the supporting men on the strike were starting to resort to the same violence they received from their employers. Cesar devoted this thought from his head as well as the men who came up with it, because he believed that nonviolent actions forced you to be more creative, in other words, it lets you keep control of the offensive, which is highly important in winning any contest, or in this case protest,

Cesar Chavez La Causa Summary

Cesar Chavez explained nonviolence as a form of bringing awareness to not only the wages, working conditions and treatment of farm workers, but also the overall treatment of marginalized people in the United States. However, growing up with the perspective of the farmworker’s inspired him to spread the word of resistance against the growers and the government as a whole. Cesar Chavez purpose of La Causa not only inspired people to become a part of something so great, but to inflict change individually by encouraging his brothers and sisters to become mentally and physically strong. Which I believe is the backbone to a non-violence protest. It’s also the mentality a social worker should inhibit because dealing with change, it requires many of

Cesar Chavez Influence On Mexican Immigration

Mexican immigration has been a controversy in the United States before 1980. According to Jie Zong and Jeanne Batalova, Mexican immigration can be divided in three waves: the first one, before World War two, the second one started with the Bracero program, and the last one after it. Nevertheless, Mexican immigration can be seen as something threat or as the opposite, a benefit to the country and it all depends on which side you want to be. The American, Cesar Chavez who was a farm worker, also creator/leader of the United Farm Workers Union, influenced ad contributed to United States history by using Mexican’s “dignity” and nonviolent strategies to showed Americans that Mexicans could accomplished hard work and being successful for the country.

Rhetorical Analysis Of Nonviolence In Cesar Chavez's Article

In a magazine article by Cesar Chavez on the 10th anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, Chavez discusses the advantages of nonviolent resistance versus violent resistance, arguing that “nonviolence is more powerful than violence.” Chavez successfully develops his argument for nonviolent resistance by utilizing the rhetorical strategies of repetition and allusion.

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Cesar Chavez

Cesar Chavez wrote a piece in the magazine of religious organization on the ten year anniversary of Martin Luther King. He starts off saying that Dr. King was a very powerful man with nonviolent means. Throughout his writing he gives many example of why nonviolence will ultimately succeed over violent means, and give of many appeals of emotional, logical, creditable justification. Dr. King may have dies, but with his death only more power has come to the peaceful citizens of the world.

Juxtaposition In Cesar Chavez Speech

To begin with, Chavez uses logos in his speech through a rhetorical question, “Who gets killed in the case of violent revolution? The poor, the workers.” The people who are arguing for violent revolutions are mostly poor workers whom Chavez refers to. Chavez uses logic to show these people that if they use violent revolts, they are most likely the ones going to be killed which for the most part will deter the people who are aiming for this. Another appeal Chavez uses is ethos to show everyone as people we are expected to do the right thing. In the speech he says, “We are convinced that when people are faced with a direct appeal from the poor struggling nonviolently against great odds, they will react positively.” This appeals to peoples’ morals by saying people are expected to react in a positive way when dealing with struggling

Compare And Contrast Cesar And Nelson Mandela

The story says that “The Association was a group of people who helped farm workers have better rights and better pay.” Chavez and his supporters successfully improved the lives of farmers and farm workers. The story states, “Through boycotts, hunger strikes, and marches, they made a difference for everyone.”These days he still inspires community activists and politicians. The story states, “His speeches about justice, community, and education still resonate…” In 2008 Barack Obama adopted Chavez’s motto “Si, Se Puede.”The story says, “Barack Obama adopted it as his campaign slogan.” Obama used it because he wanted to inspire people like Chavez. Senator Robert F. Kennedy described him as one of the best heroic figures of all time.”

How Did Cesar Chavez Help His People

Research on Cesar Chavez helps me because it gives me information about his life and what amazing things he did to help his people. Cesar Chavez was important to me because of the way he talked to bring his people up and make them stronger, he said “We draw strength from the very despair in which we have been forced to lired” ().. To me he was a hero because he made his people feel like humans and he always speaked up for them and made them feel equal, Cesar Chavez said “The fight is never about grapes or lettuce, It is always about people.”

Cesar Chavez Role Model

Cesar Chavez was a great role model and activist for farmers with bad working conditions. He stood up to large fruit-growing organizations who would not provide well-paying jobs to local citizens. For his actions, he was given numerous awards.

Cesar Chavez Non Violence Analysis

Does violence actually ever accomplish anything? Some people seem to think that it does. Cesar Chavez on the other hand, disagrees. In an article that Chavez wrote for a magazine and made some excellent points and arguments about why nonviolence is so much more effective as opposed to violence. He covers topics such as morality, or lack thereof, shown by violence and nonviolence, as well as honor. Chavez’s rhetorical choices made in favor of his argument seems to have a lasting effect as people today still resort to nonviolent acts of resistance against their government.

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of Cesar Chavez Speech

Cesar Chavez Rhetorical Analysis

Nonviolent resistance cesar chavez summary.

Due to the importance of his life and death, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is a symbol of justice and peace. In Cesar Chavez’s article published on the tenth anniversary of Dr. King’s death, he alludes to the achievements of King’s life of nonviolent actions to argue against violence. Chavez’s comparisons of ideas and words strengthen his argument about nonviolent resistance.

Cesar Chavez Pathos

Cesar Chavez, a labor leader and civil rights activist, wrote an article that discusses his strong stand on how using nonviolent resistance is the better way to go rather than using violent acts. Inspired by the tenth anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Chavez writes an article about his argument on nonviolent resistance; he accomplishes that by using rhetorical choice like allusions, pathos, and tone.

Cesar Chavez's Speech On Nonviolent Resistance

On the tenth anniversary of the assassination of Dr.Martin Luther King Jr, labor union organizer and civil rights leader Cesar Chavez writes to the magazine of a religious organization devoted to helping those in need, in order to persuade their conscientious readers that “only nonviolence will be able to achieve the goals of a civil rights activist”. Chavez establishes that violent tactics in a resistance are not effective for the cause by using juxtaposing diction in order to distinguish violent strategies and nonviolent strategies. Doing this allows him to elaborate on the later as his judgment as well as use of plural pronouns and rhetorical question drives his argument for nonviolent resistance.

Rhetorical Analysis Of Ceesar Chavez's Fight For Civil Rights

When caught in an injustice, protesters tend to use various strategies in attempt to successfully convey their opinions. In an article published by Cesar Chavez, he describes his fight for civil rights by using Martin Luther King Junior’s methods to show how violence fails to promote victory. Chavez appeals to his audience by using ethos, pathos, and allusion to highlight how nonviolence is more of an effective form of protesting.

Cesar Chavez A Hero

Cesar Chavez’s biography shows a lot about the way he was raised and how that taught him his ways and shaped his personality. Cesar was born on March 31, 1927 (Gonzales 22) and was subjected early to intense destitution because his family was one of many migrant, Mexican-American, families (Pao) that rely on the money even if the conditions were terrible for any human. His experience of the farm worker’s life was what drove him to help other workers. “Cesar and his father trudged twelve miles to Yuma looking for a bank loan. They came back covered with dust and empty-handed.”(Terzian 7) He had early experiences with upwards battles and it taught him how to manage them. Another time was captured by James Terzian when he wrote about Chavez’s dad taking care of his fellow workers. “These people are poor, ignorant peasants - campesinos! They’ll sleep anywhere, eat anything take any wage you pay. Why waste your time and money on them, eh?” said the neighbor. Cesar’s dad responds, “They are children of God. They will get shelter and soap for as long as they work on my farm.” (5). He was raised to respect workers and understand that they are people too.

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Cesar Chavez

By using powerful, evocative phrases in his writing, Chavez adds polish to the article. For instance, he says that he is “not blind to the feelings of frustration, impatience and anger” (Chavez 47-48). This potent metaphor adds liveliness to his writing, eliciting the same feeling as a rousing speech. Additionally, Chavez concocts a catchy saying that rings true for many people: “The rich may have money, but the poor have time.” (92-93). His use of metaphors and idioms transforms his article from simply functional to a powerful addition to the argument against nonviolence.

Ethos Pathos Logos In Cesar Chavez Speech

In the excerpt, Cesar Chavez, labor union organizers and civil rights leader, discusses how nonviolent resistance to problems in society easily resolves a situation better than violent protest. Throughout his speech, he uses many rhetorical strategies to argue his view on nonviolent resistance. Chavez’ use of ethos, logos, and pathos, creates his passionate attitude towards nonviolent resistance.

Rhetorical Analysis Of Cesar E. Chavez

During his address to The Commonwealth Club of San Francisco on November 9, 1984 Cesar Chavez sought support for the United Farm Workers by using rhetorical strategies such as pathos, logos and ethos to convey his message that farm workers need to stop allowing other people to treat them like inhuman farming implements to be disposed of whenever the owner feels they’ve become unprofitable. Chavez's speech starts with a description of a tragedy that highlights the mistreatment of migrants and ends with the belief that the descendants of Hispanic farm workers are the future of California and their accomplishments will enrich the entire nation. The Cesar E. Chavez Foundation articulates that as leader of the United Farm Workers of America, Cesar Chavez, saw the hopes for better lives for Mexican, Mexican American, and Hispanic workers in the United States repeatedly raised, sunk, and revived again. Many factors contributed to this seemingly unending fluctuation from hopefulness to despair, and Chavez's

Letter From Delano By Cesar Chavez Summary

“Letter from Delano”, by Cesar Chavez, the writer is attempting to perform this impossible feat on E.L. Barr Jr., the president of the California Grape and Tree Fruit League. Throughout his life, 1927 to 1993, Chavez was a prominent civil rights activist who fought for the rights of farm workers. He performed nonviolent protests including marches, boycotts, and hunger strikes. One famous boycott was the Grape Strike, in which Cesar urged Americans to buy grapes from foreign places in order to bring attention to the plight of field workers. By 1969, when the letter was written, Chavez had already co-founded the National Farm Workers Association. His goal was to fight for better treatment, increased pay, and improved working conditions. His nonviolent methods were extremely similar to the protests of Martin Luther King Jr., who was assassinated in 1968, over the rights of African Americans. In the letter, Cesar Chavez is specifically addressing claims, made by the California Grape and Tree Fruit League, of a violent protest performed by the farm workers. Throughout the letter, Chavez confronts the shocking accusations, explains his use of nonviolent methods, and emphasizes the purpose of his protests. He strives to make the president understand the plight of the workers and view their protests as a product of the worker’s determination for change, not as violent and personal attacks that

Nonviolent Pathos In Ceesar Chavez'sHe Showed Us The Way

Martin Luther King Jr. died fighting peacefully against injustice and for equal rights. Similarly, nonviolent protests must continue to be used today because violence only leads to more violence. For the tenth anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination, Cesar Chavez illustrated the importances of nonviolence in his article, “He Showed Us the Way”. In the passage, Chavez expresses strong pathos, powerful diction, and complex syntax in order to encourage nonviolence.

Rhetorical Analysis Of Cesar Chavez And Martin Luther King Jr.

Cesar Chavez and Martin Luther King Jr. were connected by a telegram and a common goal of civil rights. On the tenth anniversary of King’s death, Chavez wrote an epitaph for King. The rhetorical devices used in the article highlight clear points in agreement and contrasting with King, while displaying a simple idea: nonviolence is key.

The 60s, a period of hurt and violence. With violence all around, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. promoted nonviolent protests to guide America during a time of outrage. With sit ins, and his “I Have a Dream” speech, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. paved the way for success that our county needed. Along the way, he inspired millions of people including Cesar Chavez, a civil rights leader. With the help of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Chavez wrote a well articulated article explaining the importance of nonviolence. Cesar Chavez promotes nonviolence though appealing to pathos that leaves the audience with little doubt as to the proper course of action, decisive short syntax, and precise word choice that helps the reader

Essay On Cesar Chavez

Cesar Chavez once explained the horrors of society when he said, “When the man who feeds the world by toiling in the fields is himself deprived of the basic rights of feeding, sheltering and caring for is family, the whole community of man is sick.” (ufw.org) That means that the whole of humanity is sick and cruel when the man who works the fields all day long to feed the all of the citizens of the entire world can’t even provide for himself. It was not a small amount of people it affected, it was millions, and millions of citizens across the world. Chavez was a large factor in beginning to abolish racism, or also called the Civil Rights Movement.

Emotional Analysis Of C�sar Ch�vez Saved My Life By C�sar Alejandrez

César Chavez once said, “Nonviolence is not inaction. It is not discussion. It is not for the timid or weak. Non-violence is hard work. It is the willingness to sacrifice It is the patience to win.”. His words inspired one young man to turn his life around and become a man of character who used his experiences to help others. In his essay “César Chávez Saved My Life” Daniel “Nene” Alejandrez tells his story of the struggle and anger towards many injustices that happen around him and his journey from channeling that anger through crime to using it to start a foundation Barrios Unidos, to help men in prison overcome poverty, and the drug and violence culture surrounding them. In his essay, Alejandrez uses key scenes from his life to convey his main theme of spiritual connection to overcome the many hardships the Latino community faces in this country.

The Rhetorical Analysis Of Cear Chavez

By persuading the audience to sympathize with his point of view, Chavez develops emotional appeals through pathos. In the beginning of the article, Chavez focuses primarily on his side of the argument, but he does not forget to acknowledge the views of the opposing side. He recognizes the conflicting side’s emotions when he says, “We advocate militant nonviolence as our means of achieving justice for our people, but we are not blind to the feelings of frustration, impatience and anger…” (Chavez). By appealing to the audience’s emotions, Chavez creates an understanding relationship with the reader, making them more accepting of his

Toni Lohroff

High school english portfolio, rhetorical analysis #1 decent.

Justice: noun – just behavior or treatment; the quality of being fair and reasonable. On April 4, 1978, Cesar Chavez – world renowned labor union organizer and civil rights activist – published a magazine article devoted to just that: justice and equality for field workers throughout America. Within his article, Chavez expertly utilizes rhetorical devices and writing methods to promote his idea of nonviolent resistance to achieve justice for farm laborers in the United States and beyond.

Cesar Chavez first makes use of the rhetorical device known as allusion, in a few different parts of his article. Allusion is an instance where an author or speaker references something well known to the audience to aid in clarity and ease of connection to their own idea. Chavez opens his piece with an example of allusion by referring to the life and goals of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. when he says, “Dr. King’s entire life was an example of power that nonviolence brings to bear in the real world.” When he does this, Chavez reminds people of a noble and worthy cause that is near and dear to many people’s hearts and minds, and, at the same time, also makes the connection to his own cause, stating, “It…inspired so much of the philosophy and strategy of the farm workers’ movement.” With the use of this allusion, Chavez can assure that his audience associates of his own movement with the same nobility, urgency, and importance that they did with the efforts of Dr. King. It also helps readers to understand what Chavez is fighting for and how passionate he is about his cause, just like Dr. King. He also uses allusion when he refers to the nonviolent teachings of Indian independence leader Mahatma Gandhi, saying, “The boycott, as Gandhi taught, is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change, allowing masses of people to participate actively in a cause.” Because Chavez is also an activist for nonviolent peace and justice, he references Gandhi to ensure that the audience could connect something well known and apply it, in the same way, to Chavez’s farm workers’ movement. While helping the audience to connect and clarify his movement with those of other past, well known, and successful civil rights and equality activists, Chavez also forces readers to remember times when problems were peacefully resolved, and how it can happen again and again, no matter the goal.

Another effective method that Chavez uses in his article about nonviolent acts to obtain justice is his first person point of view. All throughout the article, Chavez writes in a way that presents him as not only a leader and creator of the farm workers’ movement, but as one of the farm workers demanding equality. For example, he says, “[nonviolent protests] are not only weapons against the growers, but our way of avoiding the senseless violence that brings no honor to any class or community.” With his use of first person point of view, Chavez places himself on the same level as the farm workers and presents himself as an equal, never expressing the feeling that he is above them or speaking down on them. To the reader, this helps establish faith, trust, and confidence in the author by allowing them to realize that he has experienced the injustices that he explains. It also helps the credibility of movement to the audience to know that Chavez not only created, but was a part of the movement, not just standing by and watching it happen. Another example of this is when Chavez concludes, “We know that most likely we are not going to do anything else the rest of our lives except build our union.” His use of first person point of view in this sentence shows readers that he, and all of the others who stand with his movement, are doing what they can to achieve justice, and that they will not just stand by and wait, even if they know nothing will happen to benefit them. Chavez’s use of first person point of view in his article about nonviolent acts for justice aids in establishing trust, confidence, and sympathy in the reader because they know that he is one of the people fighting for his movement, not just standing by and watching.

The final method that Chavez uses to increase the effectiveness of his article is word choice. Throughout his piece, he focuses the choice of his words to hit pathos, or the emotion of the reader. For example, Chavez uses words like “demoralization,” “misery, poverty, and exploitation,” and “seemingly insurmountably odds” while discussing his goal of a nonviolent road to peace and justice for farm laborers. With the use of these kinds of words, the author brings a beleaguered and longing tone to the piece, causing readers to feel weighed down with equal the force of oppression of Chavez and his fellow farm laborers. In other words, by utilizing language that has an oppressed and besieged connotation, Chavez evoked compassion in his audience. With this strategy of word choice to arouse pathos, when Chavez says something like “The burdens of generations of poverty and powerlessness lie heavy in the fields of America,” the readers can feel the same sense of powerlessness that the author describes, and it causes them to both relate more to the story, and feel more emotionally involved in the cause.

Cesar Chavez utilizes a few different rhetorical devices and writing methods when discussing the need for nonviolent protests in his movement for farm laborer’s justice. The effective uses of allusions, first person point of view, and word choice allow Chavez to evoke the maximum amount of knowledge, support, and sympathy from his audience in order to make his article more effective and informational. Justice and equality are human rights, and – as Cesar Chavez explains – all people, including farm workers, deserve them, no matter how they might be achieved.

Olivia Myers

Rhetorical analysis – martin luther king jr. (2 – alright).

Cesar Chavez, on the tenth anniversary of the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., emphasizes his argument about the need for nonviolent resistance. He repeats the fact that nonviolence is more powerful than violence by appealing to ethos and pathos, bringing rhetorical devices into play, and using specific examples. Chavez appeals to his audience and gives a logical argument as to why more should turn to nonviolence to accomplish their efforts.

Appealing to ethos and pathos allowed Chavez to engage his audience into his argument. Showing the credibility and evidence of his work, makes his point believable to the audience. For example, he points out Gandhi’s use of nonviolent protest, boycotting, in lines 62 – 64. He says that boycotting allowed “masses of people to participate actively in a cause.” Later on, the author shows emotional ties by appealing to pathos by describing the realities of life. When describing the balance between strategy and real understanding Chavez writes saying, “However important the struggle is and however much misery, poverty and exploitation exist, we know that it cannot be more important than one human life.” By giving the audience emotions and situations that they can relate to, it allows the author to be more connected to them.

Consistently through his argument, Chavez using rhetorical devices, such as personification and imagery, to develop his argument against violence. In lines 65 and 66 the author explains that violence never comes as a victory. He uses personification to explain that, “When victory comes through violence, it is a victory with strings attached .” By using personification it allows the audience to better understand the author’s purpose. Chavez also uses imagery throughout the piece to paint a picture to the audience of how nonviolence is more effective. In lines 17 – 32 the author compares the effects of violence versus nonviolence. With violence he says, “There will be many injuries and perhaps deaths on both sides.” As with non-violence Chavez explains that, “We are convinced that when people are faced with a direct appeal from the poor struggling nonviolently against great odds, they will react positively.” Using imagery, the author is able to show the effects on both ends of the spectrum.

Lastly, Chavez crafts his argument against violence, using specific examples of how non-violence could positively affect the country. For instance, the prompting of the argument started with the non-violent movement of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. The author points out explaining that King’s death helped our country grow and mature through the Civil Rights Movement. In another example, Chavez explains the positives of nonviolence in lines 54 – 61 saying, “Freedom is best experienced through participation and self-determination, and free men and women instinctively prefer democratic change to any other means. Thus, demonstrations and marches, strikes, and boycotts are not only weapons against the growers, but our way of avoiding the senseless violence that brings no honor to any class or community.” By providing specific examples and evidence of how nonviolence works positively, it draws in the audience and persuades them to see the good in solving issues large and small without violence.

Cesar Chavez’s speech promoting nonviolence effectively proves his point against violence. With the use of ethos, pathos, rhetorical devices, and specific examples, the author points out to the audience what is best for human life. Through all walks of life, Chavez proves that nonviolence is effective for everyone.

Rhetorical Analysis Of Cesar Chavez

The 1960s represents the height of a mass civil rights movements. After Martin Luther king Jr’s death there was a massive uproar of violence all over the country. Cesar Chavez, a mexican labor union organizer and civil rights leader, published an article on the tenth anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., to farm workers and others who fight for equal rights. In this article Cesar Chavez aims to convince the readers that nonviolence is the most puissant and effective way form of resistance, much stronger than violence. He develops his argument through the use of allusion to famous figures and through his use of pathos. Cesar Chavez uses many rhetorical strategies. One of them is allusion to famous figure. Cesar Chavez Show More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Violence By Cesar Chavez

King, Jr., labor union organizer and civil rights leader Cesar Chavez published an article arguing that, “nonviolence is more powerful than violence”(12). Cesar Chavez exhibits his perspective of nonviolence through the use of rhetorical question, pathos and anecdote. Chavez’s precise rhetorical question forces the reader to ponder the consequences of violence. He states, “Who gets killed in the case of a violent revolution?”(78). Chavez then reveals that those who are killed in violent revolutions…

Words 487 - Pages 2

Rhetorical Analysis Of Pathos By Cesar Chavez

as deep as any other resistance. Cesar Chavez makes a persuasive argument for nonviolent resistance in a published article, using two main rhetorical devices: Ethos and Pathos. With the expert wielding of such highly persuasive weapons, Chavez uses ethos and logos to twist the hearts of the readers and then ring them out, making them feel emotionally responsible to act, and then in turn convincing them the only way to act is through nonviolent resistance. Chavez uses ethos, or moral appeals, to get…

Words 650 - Pages 3

Summary Of Rhetorical Analysis Essay By Cesar Chavez

famous quote by Cesar Chavez is enshrouded by both an optimistic and pessimistic mindset; both of which are profoundly used to convey a single moral. In a sense, the entire quotation is an extended metaphor, all likely to “connect” with the reader on a personal level to further emphasize his initial points, rather than to generalize it; thereby making the message less effective. The following essay is intended to review, reorientate Chavez’s quote with the usage of careful analysis from both an ethical…

Words 486 - Pages 2

1105333226 2004 English Advanced Notes Hussain Essay

his audiences’ attention in increasing degrees from the past, to the present and to the call for action that shapes their future. The concluding paragraph develops Lincoln’s political message – the greatness of those ‘brave men’ who have died. The rhetorical technique of triple utterances is noticeable in the repetition of ‘we cannot dedicate… consecrate… hollow this…

Words 7927 - Pages 32

Maddi's Portfolio

Rhetorical Analysis Best

Civil rights leader, Cesar Chavez, in his article published in a magazine of a religious organization, expresses his opinion on violence throughout the world. Chavez’s purpose is to open the eyes of the readers to the fact that violence will only make things worse whereas dealing with a problem in a nonviolent way will help contain the situation. Chavez has a serious tone about nonviolent resistance while talking to the lower class farm workers of the U.S.

The article, by Cesar Chavez, begins by talking about Dr. King and his movement as well as his death. With bringing up this topic Chavez is appealing to pathos. With appealing to pathos Chavez is using the readers emotions to gain their approval. Bringing emotion into the article makes the readers emotionally invested into the topic of the writing. Chavez also appeals to pathos by discussing how over the years many have suffered from violence. Chavez uses these examples to prove to the readers that violence only ends with people getting hurt. However, if people chose to take the nonviolent route they would gain supporters and respect from others while achieving their goals.

Another technique Chavez uses is that he is very strategic when it comes to diction. Chavez uses the word “we” which creates a bond between him and his audience. With using the word “we” Chavez makes the readers feel like they are connected with him. Chavez presents himself as not only a leader but a struggling lower class farm worker. With making this connection Chavez appeals to ethos. Chavez is saying that he is in the same boat with the rest of the poverty stricken society. This creates a stronger credibility for Chavez. If he is living in the same shoes as the workers then he obviously has the credibility to speak out and stand up for what he believes in.

One other technique Chavez uses is repetition of the word violence/nonviolence. Chavez uses the words violence and nonviolence a total of 27 times throughout the article. With repeating these words multiple times throughout the article is puts on emphasis on the main idea in the article and makes the point more memorable. Chavez repeats the words violence and nonviolence because those are the key points in his argument. His entire article revolves around violence and nonviolence. When repeating these words Chavez is making the readers realize how big of a role violence played in society in the past as well as how much it plays a role in society today.

Cesar Chavez got his point across throughout the article. Chavez uses rhetorical devices such as appealing to ethos, pathos, and repetition of words to put an emphasis on his main purpose, violence will only lead to hurt whereas a nonviolent approach will help one achieve their goals. Chavez goes through the entire article giving specific examples of when violence has led to more violence. Never fight fire with fire. If society would just choose to take the nonviolent route they would gain much more support and be able to reach their goal.

Cesar Chavez Speech Rhetorical Analysis

Cesar Chavez published an article in a religious magazine on the tenth anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.’s death. Chavez’s message is delivered with a humble yet serious tone, as he shows compassion in his writing to emphasize his purpose, which is to bring attention to the importance of non-violent acts over violent acts, and to overall strive to gain the support of his audience, which generally those devoted to helping those in need. The persona of the author helps the audience create a stronger connection with and be further persuaded by Chavez because the audience can infer that he has experienced and is a strong supporter himself of nonviolence by the use of his examples and his points of view. By using rhetorical strategies such …show more content…

In this essay, the author

By comparing the two through very direct sentences, he indicates that nonviolence is more powerful than violence while violence leads to “many injuries and perhaps deaths on both sides or there will be total demoralization” (lines 19-21), nonviolence is “supportive and crucial.” Using contrasting diction and connecting violence to images of death and demoralization as well as explaining how it will affect both sides, demonstrates how violence is harmful to everyone. Then by highlighting the power as well as the morality of nonviolence, by using bold statements such as “support” “justice” and “powerful” appeals the the audience and further influences them to advocate and support nonviolence as well as view it as superior to violence due to the powerful diction Chavez used to bring attention to the values of …show more content…

Nonviolence provides the opportunity to stay off of the offensive, and this is of crucial importance to win any contest.” (lines 12-16). Also, repetition is found throughout the passage when he mentions the detrimental effects a violent resistance can produce. The repetition of the word nonviolence followed by things that result from it allows him to emphasize the importance of nonviolence and implant the ideals of nonviolence in the audience's mind to cause them to further consider the topic of non violence. This argument can sway the reader to agree with him and further asserts his opinion that nonviolence is the correct way to go about an issue. By utilizing this strategy, Chavez stresses non violence to his audience and achieves his purpose of bringing attention the the success and essentiality of non-violence gaining the support of his audience. Chavez uses multiple rhetorical strategies to bring forth the ideal that nonviolence and achieves his purpose by show his involvement and compassion in nonviolence. He delivers strong arguments to gain the support of his followers and achieves his purpose of bringing attention to and gaining the support of nonviolence.Today Cesar Chavez leaves a legacy as one of the prime examples of a nonviolent protester and is known for founding president

cesar chavez magazine article rhetorical analysis

IMAGES

COMMENTS